Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Aug 10;107(32):14048-52.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001031107. Epub 2010 Aug 2.

Metabolic adaptation for low energy throughput in orangutans

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Metabolic adaptation for low energy throughput in orangutans

Herman Pontzer et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Energy is the fundamental currency of life--needed for growth, repair, and reproduction--but little is known about the metabolic physiology and evolved energy use strategies of the great apes, our closest evolutionary relatives. Here we report daily energy use in free-living orangutans (Pongo spp.) and test whether observed differences in energy expenditure among orangutans, humans, and other mammals reflect known differences in life history. Using the doubly labeled water method, we measured daily energy expenditure (kCal/d) in orangutans living in a large indoor/outdoor habitat at the Great Ape Trust. Despite activity levels similar to orangutans in the wild, Great Ape Trust orangutans used less energy, relative to body mass, than nearly any eutherian mammal ever measured, including sedentary humans. Such an extremely low rate of energy use has not been observed previously in primates, but is consistent with the slow growth and low rate of reproduction in orangutans, and may be an evolutionary response to severe food shortages in their native Southeast Asian rainforests. These results hold important implications for the management of orangutan populations in captivity and in the wild, and underscore the flexibility and interdependence of physiological, behavioral, and life history strategies in the evolution of apes and humans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
DEE versus body mass for mammals. (Inset) Full comparative dataset for eutherian mammals (Table S1). Open circles and triangle represent orangutan adults and juvenile; gray circle and triangle represent human adults and juveniles in a subsistence/agricultural economy (25); black circle and triangle represent human adults and juveniles in industrial economies (–38); gray squares represent other eutherian mammals. “S” indicates three-toed sloths (Bradypus variegates); “H” indicates howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Standardized residual DEE, calculated from the mammalian trend line. Orangutans (open bars); humans in industrial (Ind) economies (dark gray bars) (–38); and humans in subsistence/agricultural (SA) economies (light gray bars) (26). (A) Adults: dashed line in the orangutan bar indicates the median of the orangutan sample (n = 3). Error bars indicate SD. (B) Juveniles; groups as in A.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Basal and resting metabolic rates in hominoids. Mean BMR for adult humans (20) and chimpanzees (13) and RMR for adult orangutans, as a percentage of the expected BMR value for mammals of similar body mass (39). Error bars indicate SD. Estimated BMR, calculated as RMR divided by 1.2 (21), is also shown for orangutans (dashed line in orangutan bar).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Activity profiles for orangutans in the wild and at the Great Ape Trust (adults, n = 3; juvenile, n = 1). (A) Feeding and resting. Hashed area indicates time spent feeding. Wild and Great Ape Trust orangutans also sleep approximately 12 h each night. Wild data are from populations in masting forests (i.e., forests that experience periodic crashes in food availability) (40). (B) Walking, which includes the horizontal distance traveled in the canopy and, for Great Ape Trust subjects, the distance traversed along enclosure walls. Wild data are from both Borneo and Sumatra [n = 8 sites; mean, 712 m/d; range, 162–1,077 m/d (41)]. (C) Climbing, which includes all vertical travel (ascent only). Wild data (mean, 88.3 m/d; range, 55.7–121.4 m/d) from full day follows of eight adults (SI Methods). Great Ape Trust data shown in Table S3.

References

    1. Nagy KA, Girard IA, Brown TK. Energetics of free-ranging mammals, reptiles, and birds. Annu Rev Nutr. 1999;19:247–277. - PubMed
    1. Knott CD. In: Reproductive Ecology and Human Evolution. Ellison PT, editor. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 2001. pp. 429–463.
    1. Charnov EL, Ernest SKM. The offspring-size/clutch-size trade-off in mammals. Am Nat. 2006;167:578–582. - PubMed
    1. McNab BK. The influence of food habits on the energetics of eutherian mammals. Ecol Monogr. 1986;56:1–19.
    1. Sibly RM, Brown JH. Effects of body size and lifestyle on evolution of mammal life histories. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:17707–17712. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types