Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Aug;67(8):793-802.
doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.90.

A randomized add-on trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant bipolar depression

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized add-on trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant bipolar depression

Nancy Diazgranados et al. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Context: Existing therapies for bipolar depression have a considerable lag of onset of action. Pharmacological strategies that produce rapid antidepressant effects-for instance, within a few hours or days-would have an enormous impact on patient care and public health.

Objective: To determine whether an N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor antagonist produces rapid antidepressant effects in subjects with bipolar depression.

Design: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover, add-on study conducted from October 2006 to June 2009.

Setting: Mood Disorders Research Unit at the National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland. Patients Eighteen subjects with DSM-IV bipolar depression (treatment-resistant).

Interventions: Subjects maintained at therapeutic levels of lithium or valproate received an intravenous infusion of either ketamine hydrochloride (0.5 mg/kg) or placebo on 2 test days 2 weeks apart. The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale was used to rate subjects at baseline and at 40, 80, 110, and 230 minutes and on days 1, 2, 3, 7, 10, and 14 postinfusion.

Main outcome measures: Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale primary efficacy measure scores.

Results: Within 40 minutes, depressive symptoms significantly improved in subjects receiving ketamine compared with placebo (d = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.76); this improvement remained significant through day 3. The drug difference effect size was largest at day 2 (d = 0.80, 95% CI, 0.55-1.04). Seventy-one percent of subjects responded to ketamine and 6% responded to placebo at some point during the trial. One subject receiving ketamine and 1 receiving placebo developed manic symptoms. Ketamine was generally well tolerated; the most common adverse effect was dissociative symptoms, only at the 40-minute point.

Conclusion: In patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression, robust and rapid antidepressant effects resulted from a single intravenous dose of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00088699.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Enrollment, randomization, withdrawals, and completion of the 2 treatment phases (n=18).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Change in depression scale scores during 2 weeks in patients with bipolar disorder given placebo and ketamine (n=18). Values are expressed as generalized least-square means and standard errors for the intent-to-treat analysis. BDI indicates Beck Depression Inventory; HAM-D, 17-item Hamilton Scale for Depression; MADRS, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale; *P<.001; †P<.01; and ‡P<.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proportion of responders and remitters after ketamine or placebo infusion by Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score. A, Proportion of responders (50% improvement on MADRS) from 40 minutes to day 14 postinfusion (n=18). B, Proportion of remitters (MADRS score <10) from 40 minutes to day 14 postinfusion (n=18).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Change in psychiatric scale scores in patients with bipolar disorder given placebo and ketamine (n=18). Values are expressed as generalized least-square means and standard errors for the intent-to-treat analysis. BPRS indicates Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; CADSS, Clinician Administered Dissociative Scale; YMRS, Young Mania Rating Scale; *P<.05; †P<.01; and ‡P<.001.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Merikangas KR, Akiskal HS, Angst J, Greenberg PE, Hirschfeld RM, Petukhova M, Kessler RC. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of bipolar spectrum disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(5):543–552. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Calabrese JR, Huffman RF, White RL, Edwards S, Thompson TR, Ascher JA, Monaghan ET, Leadbetter RA. Lamotrigine in the acute treatment of bipolar depression: results of five double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Bipolar Disord. 2008;10(2):323–333. - PubMed
    1. Sachs GS, Nierenberg AA, Calabrese JR, Marangell LB, Wisniewski SR, Gyulai L, Friedman ES, Bowden CL, Fossey MD, Ostacher MJ, Ketter TA, Patel J, Hauser P, Rapport D, Martinez JM, Allen MH, Miklowitz DJ, Otto MW, Dennehy EB, Thase ME. Effectiveness of adjunctive antidepressant treatment for bipolar depression. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(17):1711–1722. - PubMed
    1. Nierenberg AA, Ostacher MJ, Calabrese JR, Ketter TA, Marangell LB, Miklowitz DJ, Miyahara S, Bauer MS, Thase ME, Wisniewski SR, Sachs GS. Treatment-resistant bipolar depression: a STEP-BD equipoise randomized effectiveness trial of antidepressant augmentation with lamotrigine, inositol, or risperidone. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(2):210–216. - PubMed
    1. Weisler RH, Calabrese JR, Thase ME, Arvekvist R, Stening G, Paulsson B, Suppes T. Efficacy of quetiapine monotherapy for the treatment of depressive episodes in bipolar I disorder: a post hoc analysis of combined results from 2 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(5):769–782. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data