Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2010 Sep 1;28(25):3929-36.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.2491. Epub 2010 Aug 2.

Patient-reported outcomes in sentinel node-negative adjuvant breast cancer patients receiving sentinel-node biopsy or axillary dissection: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project phase III protocol B-32

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Patient-reported outcomes in sentinel node-negative adjuvant breast cancer patients receiving sentinel-node biopsy or axillary dissection: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project phase III protocol B-32

Stephanie R Land et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Erratum in

  • J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec 20;28(36):5350

Abstract

Purpose: Sentinel lymph node resection (SNR) may reduce morbidity while providing the same clinical utility as conventional axillary dissection (AD). National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-32 is a randomized phase III trial comparing SNR immediately followed by AD (SNAD) to SNR and subsequent AD if SN is positive. We report the definitive patient-reported outcomes (PRO) comparisons.

Patients and methods: Eligible patients had clinically node-negative, operable invasive breast cancer. The PRO substudy included all SN-negative participants enrolled May 2001 to February 2004 at community institutions in the United States (n = 749; 78% age > or = 50; 87% clinical tumor size < or = 2.0 cm; 84% lumpectomy; 87% white). They completed questionnaires presurgery, 1 and 2 to 3 weeks postoperatively, and every 6 months through year 3. Arm symptoms, arm use avoidance, activity limitations, and quality of life (QOL) were compared with intent-to-treat two-sample t-tests and repeated measures analyses.

Results: Arm symptoms were significantly more bothersome for SNAD compared with SNR patients at 6 months (mean, 4.8 v 3.0; P < .001) and at 12 months (3.6 v 2.5; P = .006). Longitudinally, SNAD patients were more likely to experience ipsilateral arm and breast symptoms, restricted work and social activity, and impaired QOL (P < or = .002 all items). From 12 to 36 months, fewer than 15% of either SNAD or SNR patients reported moderate or greater severity of any given symptom or activity limitation.

Conclusion: Arm morbidity was greater with SNAD than with SNR. Despite considerable fears about complications from AD for breast cancer, this study demonstrates that initial problems with either surgery resolve over time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
CONSORT diagram. SN, sentinel node; SNAD, SN resection followed by axillary dissection; SNR, sentinel node resection.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-32 schema. (*) Patients in whom a sentinel lymph node is not identified will go on for axillary dissection.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
(A) Longitudinal graph of the proportion of patients with any restriction in recreational or social activity, among those with no restriction at baseline. P values from repeated measures logistic regression are shown. (B) Longitudinal graph of the percentage of patients with any restriction in occupational activity, among those with no restriction at baseline. P values from repeated measures logistic regression are shown. (C) Longitudinal graph of the mean quality of life score. P values from repeated measures linear regression are shown. SNAD, sentinel node resection followed by axillary dissection; SNR, sentinel node resection; QOL, quality of life.
Fig A1.
Fig A1.
Box plots illustrate the distribution of major end point scales. Boxes are drawn from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Heavy horizontal lines within boxes are drawn at the median. Circles are potential outliers; larger circles reflect multiple equal observations. SNAD, sentinel node resection followed by axillary dissection; SNR, sentinel node resection.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7703–7720. - PubMed
    1. Mansel RE, Fallowfield L, Kissin M, et al. Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: The ALMANAC trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:599–609. - PubMed
    1. Fleissig A, Fallowfield LJ, Langridge CI, et al. Post-operative arm morbidity and quality of life. Results of the ALMANAC randomised trial comparing sentinel node biopsy with standard axillary treatment in the management of patients with early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;95:279–293. - PubMed
    1. Zavagno G, De Salvo GL, Scalco G, et al. A randomized clinical trial on sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer: Results of the Sentinella/GIVOM trial. Ann Surg. 2008;247:207–213. - PubMed
    1. Gill G. Sentinel-lymph-node-based management or routine axillary clearance? One-year outcomes of sentinel node biopsy versus axillary clearance (SNAC): A randomized controlled surgical trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:266–275. - PubMed

Publication types