Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Aug;126(2):619-625.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de24bc.

Identifying and avoiding bias in research

Affiliations
Review

Identifying and avoiding bias in research

Christopher J Pannucci et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

This narrative review provides an overview on the topic of bias as part of a series of articles in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery on evidence-based medicine. Bias can occur in the planning, data collection, analysis, and publication phases of research. Understanding research bias allows readers to critically and independently review the scientific literature and avoid treatments that are suboptimal or potentially harmful. A thorough understanding of bias and how it affects study results is essential for the practice of evidence-based medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Major Sources of Bias in Clinical Research

References

    1. Godlee F. Milestones on the long road to knowledge. BMJ. 2007;334(Suppl 1):s2–3. - PubMed
    1. Howes N, Chagla L, Thorpe M, et al. Surgical practice is evidence based. Br. J. Surg. 1997;84:1220–1223. - PubMed
    1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, et al. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996;312:71–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Loiselle F, Mahabir RC, Harrop AR. Levels of evidence in plastic surgery research over 20 years. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2008;121:207e–11e. - PubMed
    1. Chang EY, Pannucci CJ, Wilkins EG. Quality of clinical studies in aesthetic surgery journals: A 10-year review. Aesthet. Surg. J. 2009;29:144–7. discussion 147-9. - PubMed

Publication types