Identifying and avoiding bias in research
- PMID: 20679844
- PMCID: PMC2917255
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de24bc
Identifying and avoiding bias in research
Abstract
This narrative review provides an overview on the topic of bias as part of a series of articles in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery on evidence-based medicine. Bias can occur in the planning, data collection, analysis, and publication phases of research. Understanding research bias allows readers to critically and independently review the scientific literature and avoid treatments that are suboptimal or potentially harmful. A thorough understanding of bias and how it affects study results is essential for the practice of evidence-based medicine.
Figures
References
-
- Godlee F. Milestones on the long road to knowledge. BMJ. 2007;334(Suppl 1):s2–3. - PubMed
-
- Howes N, Chagla L, Thorpe M, et al. Surgical practice is evidence based. Br. J. Surg. 1997;84:1220–1223. - PubMed
-
- Loiselle F, Mahabir RC, Harrop AR. Levels of evidence in plastic surgery research over 20 years. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2008;121:207e–11e. - PubMed
-
- Chang EY, Pannucci CJ, Wilkins EG. Quality of clinical studies in aesthetic surgery journals: A 10-year review. Aesthet. Surg. J. 2009;29:144–7. discussion 147-9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical