The incidence of hypoxemia during surgery: evidence from two institutions
- PMID: 20680710
- PMCID: PMC2991088
- DOI: 10.1007/s12630-010-9366-5
The incidence of hypoxemia during surgery: evidence from two institutions
Abstract
Purpose: The incidence of hypoxemia in patients undergoing surgery is largely unknown and may have a clinical impact. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia in a large surgical population.
Methods: We performed a retrospective study of electronically recorded pulse oximetry data obtained from two large academic medical centres. All adults (age ≥ 16 yr) undergoing non-cardiac surgery during a three-year period at the two hospitals were included in the analysis. Our main outcome measure was the percentage of patients with episodes of hypoxemia (SpO(2) < 90) or severe hypoxemia (SpO(2) ≤ 85) for two minutes or longer during the intraoperative period (induction of anesthesia, surgery, and emergence).
Results: We evaluated 95,407 electronic anesthesia records at the two hospitals. During the intraoperative period, 6.8% of patients had a hypoxemic event, and 3.5% of patients had a severely hypoxemic event of two consecutive minutes or longer. Seventy percent of the hypoxemic episodes occurred during either induction or emergence- time periods that represent 21% of the total intraoperative time. From induction to emergence, one episode of hypoxemia occurred every 28.9 hr, and one episode of severe hypoxemia occurred every 55.7 hr of intraoperative time.
Conclusion: Despite advances in monitoring technology, hypoxemia continues to occur commonly in the operating room and may be a serious safety concern because of its potential impact on end organ function and long-term outcomes. Further studies are needed to improve our understanding of the clinical impact of intraoperative hypoxemia and the strategies that will be most useful in minimizing its occurrence.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
Hypoxemia during surgery: learning from history, science, and current practice.Can J Anaesth. 2010 Oct;57(10):877-81. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9367-4. Can J Anaesth. 2010. PMID: 20661678 English, French. No abstract available.
References
-
- Severinghaus JW, Kelleher JF. Recent developments in pulse oximetry. Anesthesiology. 1992;76:1018–38. - PubMed
-
- Merchant R, Bosenberg C, Brown K, et al. Guidelines to the practice of anesthesia - Revised edition 2010. Can J Anesth. 2010;57:58–87. - PubMed
-
- Anesthesiologists ASA. Standards of the American Society of Anesthesiologists: Standards for Basic Anesthetic Monitoring. [April 2010]. Available from URL: http://www.asahq.org/publicationsAndServices/standards/02.pdf.
-
- Eichhorn JH, Cooper JB, Cullen DJ, Maier WR, Philip JH, Seeman RG. Standards for patient monitoring during anesthesia at Harvard Medical School. JAMA. 1986;256:1017–20. - PubMed
-
- World Alliance for Patient Safety. WHO guidelines for safe surgery. Geneve: World Health Organization; 2008. [April 2010]. Available from URL: http://www.who.int/patientsafety/safesurgery/knowledge_base/SSSL_Brochur....
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
