Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2010 Aug 3:18:22.
doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-18-22.

Current understanding of the relationship between cervical manipulation and stroke: what does it mean for the chiropractic profession?

Affiliations
Editorial

Current understanding of the relationship between cervical manipulation and stroke: what does it mean for the chiropractic profession?

Donald R Murphy. Chiropr Osteopat. .

Abstract

The understanding of the relationship between cervical manipulative therapy (CMT) and vertebral artery dissection and stroke (VADS) has evolved considerably over the years. In the beginning the relationship was seen as simple cause-effect, in which CMT was seen to cause VADS in certain susceptible individuals. This was perceived as extremely rare by chiropractic physicians, but as far more common by neurologists and others. Recent evidence has clarified the relationship considerably, and suggests that the relationship is not causal, but that patients with VADS often have initial symptoms which cause them to seek care from a chiropractic physician and have a stroke some time after, independent of the chiropractic visit.This new understanding has shifted the focus for the chiropractic physician from one of attempting to "screen" for "risk of complication to manipulation" to one of recognizing the patient who may be having VADS so that early diagnosis and intervention can be pursued. In addition, this new understanding presents the chiropractic profession with an opportunity to change the conversation about CMT and VADS by taking a proactive, public health approach to this uncommon but potentially devastating disorder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thornton FV. Malpractice: death resulting from chiropractic treatment of headache (medicolegal abstract) JAMA. 1934;103:1260.
    1. Lee KP, Carlini WG, McCormick GF, Albers GW. Neurologic complications following chiropractic manipulation: a survey of California neurologists. Neurology. 1995;45(6):1213–5. - PubMed
    1. Norris JW, Beletsky V, Nadareishvili ZG. Sudden neck movement and cervical artery dissection. CMAJ. 2000;163(1):38–40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dabbs V, Lauretti WJ. A risk assessment of cervical manipulation vs NSAIDs for the treatment of neck pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995;18(8):530–6. - PubMed
    1. Haneline MT, Lewkovich G. Ongoing stroke dialogue: A response to the Smith, et al study on the association of spinal manipulation and vertebral artery dissection. JACA. 2003;40(10):24–7.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources