Newer diagnostic approaches to intestinal protozoa
- PMID: 20683263
- DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e32833de0eb
Newer diagnostic approaches to intestinal protozoa
Abstract
Purpose of review: To update the reader on the latest developments in the laboratory diagnosis of intestinal protozoa.
Recent findings: Correct identification of a diarrhoea causing pathogens is essential for the choice of treatment in an individual patient as well as to map the aetiology of diarrhoea in a variety of patient populations. Classical diagnosis of diarrhoea causing protozoa by microscopic examination of a stool sample lacks both sensitivity and specificity. Alternative diagnostic platforms are discussed.
Summary: Recent literature on the diagnosis of intestinal protozoa has focused mainly on nucleic acid-based assays, in particular the specific detection of parasite DNA in stool samples using real-time PCR. In addition, the trend has been moving from single pathogen detection to a multiplex approach, allowing simultaneous identification of multiple parasites. Different combinations of targets can be used within a routine diagnostic setting, depending on the patient population, such as children, immunocompromised individuals and those who have been travelling to tropical regions. Large-scale monitoring and evaluation of control strategies become feasible due to automation and high-throughput facilities. Improved technology also has become available for differentiating protozoa subspecies, which facilitates outbreak investigations and extensive research in molecular epidemiology.
Similar articles
-
Use of "Parasep filter fecal concentrator tubes" for the detection of intestinal parasites in stool samples under routine conditions.Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2011 Jan-Mar;54(1):121-3. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.77358. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2011. PMID: 21393892
-
Comparison of different methods of detection of enteric pathogenic protozoa.Indian J Med Microbiol. 2013 Apr-Jun;31(2):154-60. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.115242. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2013. PMID: 23867672
-
Detection of diarrhoea-causing protozoa in general practice patients in The Netherlands by multiplex real-time PCR.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007 Oct;13(10):1001-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01788.x. Epub 2007 Aug 21. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007. PMID: 17714523
-
Clinical consequences of new diagnostic tools for intestinal parasites.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015 Jun;21(6):520-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.03.015. Epub 2015 Apr 2. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015. PMID: 25843505 Review.
-
[Traditional and innovative diagnostic tools: when and why they should be applied].Parassitologia. 2004 Jun;46(1-2):173-6. Parassitologia. 2004. PMID: 15305711 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Dientamoeba fragilis, One of the Neglected Intestinal Protozoa.J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Sep;54(9):2243-50. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00400-16. Epub 2016 Apr 6. J Clin Microbiol. 2016. PMID: 27053676 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Next-generation molecular-diagnostic tools for gastrointestinal nematodes of livestock, with an emphasis on small ruminants: a turning point?Adv Parasitol. 2013;83:267-333. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407705-8.00004-5. Adv Parasitol. 2013. PMID: 23876874 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of the Use of Singleplex and Duplex CerTest VIASURE Real-Time PCR Assays to Detect Common Intestinal Protist Parasites.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Feb 1;14(3):319. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14030319. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38337835 Free PMC article.
-
Recent advances in clinical parasitology diagnostics.Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2014 Nov;16(11):434. doi: 10.1007/s11908-014-0434-9. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2014. PMID: 25230603
-
Selecting PCR for the Diagnosis of Intestinal Parasitosis: Choice of Targets, Evaluation of In-House Assays, and Comparison with Commercial Kits.J Parasitol Res. 2017;2017:6205257. doi: 10.1155/2017/6205257. Epub 2017 Aug 30. J Parasitol Res. 2017. PMID: 29181192 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials