Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Apr;102(2):317-21.
doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0325-3. Epub 2010 Aug 4.

Phase II trial of ritonavir/lopinavir in patients with progressive or recurrent high-grade gliomas

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Phase II trial of ritonavir/lopinavir in patients with progressive or recurrent high-grade gliomas

Manmeet S Ahluwalia et al. J Neurooncol. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

Current therapies for recurrent or progressive high-grade gliomas (HGG, WHO grade 3-4) produce a 6-month progression-free survival of only 10-25%. Migration and invasion by HGG is mediated in part by matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) which promote remodeling of the extracellular matrix. Several HIV protease inhibitors (HIVPI) decrease the expression of MMPs in astrocytes and microglia. Given these mechanisms of antitumor activity of HIVPI, we evaluated the efficacy of ritonavir/lopinavir, a combination HIVPI, in patients with progressive or recurrent HGG in an open label phase II trial. Nineteen patients were treated in this study. Patients received ritonavir/lopinavir (400 mg/100 mg) orally twice daily. All patients were treated until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity. A complete response was seen in one patient (5%). Three patients (16%) had stable disease as the best response. Fifteen patients (79%) had progressive disease. The 6-month progression free survival (PFS(6)) was 11% (2 of 19 patients). Ritonavir/lopinavir was well tolerated in patients with heavily pretreated refractory HGG, and no grade 3 or 4 toxicity was seen. The activity at the dose and schedule used in this study, however, was modest and the study did not meet its efficacy endpoint.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Aug;17(8):2572-8 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 1;27(28):4733-40 - PubMed
    1. J Neurosurg. 1983 Feb;58(2):159-69 - PubMed
    1. Brain. 2004 Feb;127(Pt 2):398-407 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Res. 2005 Sep 15;65(18):8256-65 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources