Revisiting dietary cholesterol recommendations: does the evidence support a limit of 300 mg/d?
- PMID: 20683785
- DOI: 10.1007/s11883-010-0130-7
Revisiting dietary cholesterol recommendations: does the evidence support a limit of 300 mg/d?
Abstract
The perceived association between dietary cholesterol (DC) and risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) has resulted in recommendations of no more than 300 mg/d for healthy persons in the United States. These dietary recommendations proposed in the 1960s had little scientific evidence other than the known association between saturated fat and cholesterol and animal studies where cholesterol was fed in amounts far exceeding normal intakes. In contrast, European countries, Asian countries, and Canada do not have an upper limit for DC. Further, current epidemiologic data have clearly demonstrated that increasing concentrations of DC are not correlated with increased risk for CHD. Clinical studies have shown that even if DC may increase plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in certain individuals (hyper-responders), this is always accompanied by increases in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, so the LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio is maintained. More importantly, DC reduces circulating levels of small, dense LDL particles, a well-defined risk factor for CHD. This article presents recent evidence from human studies documenting the lack of effect of DC on CHD risk, suggesting that guidelines for DC should be revisited.
Similar articles
-
Rethinking dietary cholesterol.Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2012 Mar;15(2):117-21. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e32834d2259. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2012. PMID: 22037012 Review.
-
Increases in dietary cholesterol and fat raise levels of apoprotein E-containing lipoproteins in the plasma of man.J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983 Jun;56(6):1108-15. doi: 10.1210/jcem-56-6-1108. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983. PMID: 6841553
-
The Canadian experience: why Canada decided against an upper limit for cholesterol.J Am Coll Nutr. 2004 Dec;23(6 Suppl):616S-620S. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2004.10719432. J Am Coll Nutr. 2004. PMID: 15640515 Review.
-
The impact of egg limitations on coronary heart disease risk: do the numbers add up?J Am Coll Nutr. 2000 Oct;19(5 Suppl):540S-548S. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2000.10718978. J Am Coll Nutr. 2000. PMID: 11023005 Review.
-
Dietary fat consumption and health.Nutr Rev. 1998 May;56(5 Pt 2):S3-19; discussion S19-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1998.tb01728.x. Nutr Rev. 1998. PMID: 9624878 Review.
Cited by
-
Limitations of observational evidence: implications for evidence-based dietary recommendations.Adv Nutr. 2014 Jan 1;5(1):7-15. doi: 10.3945/an.113.004929. Adv Nutr. 2014. PMID: 24425715 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cholesterol Content, Fatty Acid Profile and Health Lipid Indices in the Egg Yolk of Eggs from Hens at the End of the Laying Cycle, Following Alpha-Ketoglutarate Supplementation.Foods. 2021 Mar 11;10(3):596. doi: 10.3390/foods10030596. Foods. 2021. PMID: 33799887 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the factors that affect blood cholesterol and heart disease risk: is dietary cholesterol as bad for you as history leads us to believe?Adv Nutr. 2012 Sep 1;3(5):711-7. doi: 10.3945/an.111.001321. Adv Nutr. 2012. PMID: 22983850 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting the impact of diet and enzymopathies on human small intestinal epithelial cells.Hum Mol Genet. 2013 Jul 1;22(13):2705-22. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt119. Epub 2013 Mar 13. Hum Mol Genet. 2013. PMID: 23492669 Free PMC article.
-
Dairy Fats and Cardiovascular Disease: Do We Really Need to be Concerned?Foods. 2018 Mar 1;7(3):29. doi: 10.3390/foods7030029. Foods. 2018. PMID: 29494487 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical