Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Dec;19(4):185-94.
doi: 10.1002/mpr.321.

Psychometric properties of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology in adolescents

Ira H Bernstein  1 , A John Rush, Madhukar H Trivedi, Carroll W Hughes, Laurie Macleod, Bradley P Witte, Shailesh Jain, Taryn L Mayes, Graham J Emslie
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Psychometric properties of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology in adolescents

Ira H Bernstein et al. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: The clinician-rated (QIDS-C₁₆) and self-report (QIDS-SR₁₆) versions of the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology have been extensively examined in adult populations. This study evaluated both versions of the QIDS and the 17-item Children's Depressive Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) in an adolescent outpatient sample.

Method: Both the QIDS-C₁₆ and QIDS-SR₁₆ were completed for the adolescents. Three different methods were used to complete the QIDS-C₁₆: (a) adolescents' responses to clinician interviews; (b) parents' responses to clinician interview; and (c) a composite score using the most pathological response from the two interviews. Both classical and item response theory methods were used. Factor analyses evaluated the dimensionality of each scale.

Results: The sample included 140 adolescent outpatients. All versions of the QIDS, save the parent interview, and the CDRS-R were very reliable (α ≥ 0.8). All four versions of the QIDS are reasonably effective and unidimensional. The CDRS-R was clearly at least two-dimensional. The CDRS-R was the most discriminating among low and extremely high levels of depression. The QIDS-SR₁₆ was the most discriminating at moderate levels of depression. There was no relation between the QIDS scores and concurrent Axis III comorbidities.

Conclusion: The QIDS-C₁₆ and the QIDS-SR₁₆ are suitable for use in adolescents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scree lots for the QIDS‐C16(Adol), QIDS‐C16(Par), QIDS‐C16(Comp) and QIDS‐SR16.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scree plot for the CDRS‐R.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Test information functions (TIFs) for the QIDS‐C16(Adol), QIDS‐C16(Par), QIDS‐C16(Comp), QIDS‐SR16, and CDRS‐R.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association . (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision, American Psychiatric Press.
    1. Birmaher B. (2007) Longitudinal course of pediatric bipolar disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 537–539. - PubMed
    1. Brent D.A. (1987) Correlates of the medical lethality of suicide attempts in children and adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26, 87–91. - PubMed
    1. Coyle J.T., Pine D.S., Charney D.S., Lewis L., Nemeroff C.B., Carlson G.A., Joshi P.T., Reiss D., Todd R.D., Hellander M. (2003) Depression and bipolar support alliance consensus statement on the unmet needs in diagnosis and treatment of mood disorders in children and adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 42, 1494–1503. - PubMed
    1. Fergusson D.M., Woodward L.J. (2002) Mental health, educational, and social role outcomes of adolescents with depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 225–231. - PubMed

Publication types