Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb 23;7(1):54-6.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0555. Epub 2010 Aug 4.

Reproductive competition and the evolution of extreme birth synchrony in a cooperative mammal

Affiliations

Reproductive competition and the evolution of extreme birth synchrony in a cooperative mammal

S J Hodge et al. Biol Lett. .

Abstract

Reproductive events in animal societies often show a high degree of temporal clustering, but the evolutionary causes of this synchronization are poorly understood. Here, we suggest that selection to avoid the negative effects of competition with other females has given rise to a remarkable degree of birth synchrony in the communal-breeding banded mongoose (Mungos mungo). Within banded mongoose groups, births are highly synchronous, with 64 per cent of females giving birth on exactly the same night. Our results indicate that this extreme synchrony arises because offspring suffer an increased risk of infanticide if their mother gives birth before other females, but suffer in competition with older littermates if their mother gives birth after them. These findings highlight the important influence that reproductive competition can have for the evolution of reproductive synchrony.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Days asynchronous (days between first and last birth per litter) in 294 litters in which more than one female bred.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The influence of (a) birth synchrony on the per cent of pups lost before emergence; (b) reproductive timing on the probability that pups survived the first week; (c) birth synchrony on the per cent of emergent pups that died before 3 months.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ims R. A. 1990. The ecology and evolution of reproductive synchrony. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5, 135–14010.1016/0169-5347(90)90218-3 (doi:10.1016/0169-5347(90)90218-3) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hodge S. J., Bell M. B. V., Mwanghuya F., Kyabulima S., Waldick R. C., Russell A. F. 2009. Maternal weight, offspring competition and the evolution of communal breeding. Behav. Ecol. 20, 729–73510.1093/beheco/arp053 (doi:10.1093/beheco/arp053) - DOI - DOI
    1. Lambin X. 1993. Determinants of the synchrony of reproduction in Townsend's voles, Microtus townsendii. Oikos 67, 107–11310.2307/3545101 (doi:10.2307/3545101) - DOI - DOI
    1. Poikonen T., Koskela E., Mappes T., Mills S. C. 2008. Infanticide in the evolution of reproductive synchrony: effects on reproductive success. Evolution 62, 612–62110.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00293.x (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00293.x) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schradin C., Kinahan A. A., Pillay N. 2009. Cooperative breeding in groups of synchronously mating females and evolution of large testes to avoid sperm depletion in African striped mice. Biol. Reprod. 81, 111–11710.1095/biolreprod.108.075838 (doi:10.1095/biolreprod.108.075838) - DOI - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources