Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2010 Aug 4:(8):CD001450.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001450.pub3.

Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy

Zarko Alfirevic  1 , Tamara Stampalija, Gillian Ml Gyte
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy

Zarko Alfirevic et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Update in

Abstract

Background: One of the main aims of routine antenatal care is to identify the 'at risk' fetus in order to apply clinical interventions which could result in reduced perinatal morbidity and mortality. Doppler ultrasound study of umbilical artery waveforms helps to identify the compromised fetus in 'high-risk' pregnancies and, therefore, deserves assessment as a screening test in 'low-risk' pregnancies.

Objectives: To assess the effects on obstetric practice and pregnancy outcome of routine fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in unselected and low-risk pregnancies.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register (May 2010).

Selection criteria: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of Doppler ultrasound for the investigation of umbilical and fetal vessels waveforms in unselected pregnancies compared to no Doppler ultrasound. Studies where uterine vessels have been assessed together with fetal and umbilical vessels have been included.

Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and carried out data extraction.

Main results: We included five trials involving 14,185 women. The methodological quality of the trials was generally unclear because of insufficient data included in the reports.Routine fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound examination in low-risk or unselected populations did not result in increased antenatal, obstetric and neonatal interventions, and no overall differences were detected for substantive short term clinical outcomes such as perinatal mortality. There is no available evidence to assess the effect on substantive long term outcomes such as childhood neurodevelopment and no data to assess maternal outcomes, particularly psychological effects.

Authors' conclusions: Existing evidence does not provide conclusive evidence that the use of routine umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound, or combination of umbilical and uterine artery Doppler ultrasound in low-risk or unselected populations benefits either mother or baby. Future studies should be designed to address small changes in perinatal outcome, and should focus on potentially preventable deaths.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

<b>Figure 1</b>
Figure 1
Methodological quality summary: review authors’ judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies included in this review

    1. Breart G, Uzan S, Uzan M. Doppler ultrasound screening during pregnancy [Letter; comment] Lancet. 1993;341(8843):501–2. - PubMed
    2. Davies J, Spencer J, Gallivan S. Randomised trial of Doppler screening in a general obstetric population. Proceedings of the 26th British Congress of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Manchester, UK. July 7-10.1992. 1992.
    3. Davies JA, Gallivan S, Spencer JAD. Randomised controlled trial of doppler ultrasound screening of placental perfusion during pregnancy. Lancet. 1992;340:1299–303. - PubMed
    4. Spencer JAD, Davies JA, Gallivan S. Randomised trial of routine Doppler screening during pregnancy. Journal of Maternal Fetal Investigation. 1992;1:126.
    1. Doppler French Study Group A randomised controlled trial of Doppler ultrasound velocimetry of the umbilical artery in low risk pregnancies. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1997;104:419–22. - PubMed
    1. Mason GC, Lilford RJ, Porter J, Nelson E, Tyrell S. Randomised comparison of routine versus highly selective use of Doppler ultrasound in low risk pregnancies. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1993;100:130–3. - PubMed
    1. Evans S, Newnham J, MacDonald W, Hall C. Characterisation of the possible effect on birthweight following frequent prenatal ultrasound examinations. Early Human Development. 1996;45(3):203–14. - PubMed
    2. Newnham J, MacDonald W, Gurrin L, Evans S, Landau L, Stanley F. The effect of frequent prenatal ultrasound on birthweight: follow up at one year of age. Proceedings of the 14th Australian Perinatal Society in conjunction with the New Zealand Perinatal Society; Adelaide, Australia. 1996 March 24-27.1996.
    3. Newnham JP, Doherty DA, Kendall GE, Zubrick SR, Landau LL, Stanley FJ. Effects of repeated prenatal ultrasound examinations on childhood outcome up to 8 years of age: follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:2038–44. - PubMed
    4. Newnham JP, Evans SF, Michael CA, Stanley FJ, Landau LI. Effects of frequent ultrasound during pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1993;342:887–91. - PubMed
    1. Hanretty KP. Randomized study of doppler waveforms in umbilical and uterine arteries as a screening method to identify the compromised fetus. Personal communication. 1988
    2. Whittle MJ, Hanretty KP, Primrose MH, Neilson JP. Screening for the compromised fetus: A randomised trial of umbilical artery velocimetry in unselected pregnancies. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1994;170(2):555–9. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

    1. Ellwood D, Peek M, Curren J. Predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes with ultrasound. A randomised controlled trial. Personal communication. 1997
    1. Goffinet F, Aboulker D, Paris-Llado J, Bucourt M, Uzan M, Papiernik E, et al. Screening with a uterine doppler in low risk pregnant women followed by low dose aspirin in women with abnormal results: a multicenter randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2001;108:510–8. - PubMed
    1. Gonsoulin MD. Umbilical artery Doppler waveform analysis: a randomized study on effect on outcome. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1991;164:370.
    1. Schneider KT, Amberg-Wendland D, Renz S, Furstenau U. Prospective randomized study of the clinical value of Doppler sonography as a screening procedure. Gynakologische Rundschau. 1991;31(Suppl 1):139–40. - PubMed
    2. Schneider KTM, Renz S, Furstenau U, Amberg-Wendland D, Prochaska D, Graeff H. Doppler flow measurements as a screening method during pregnancy: Is it worth the effort? Journal of Maternal Fetal Investigation. 1992;1:125.
    1. Scholler J, Putz M, Sainz HG, Altrichter R, Philipp K. Value of Doppler sonography in management of non-risk pregnancies at term [Der Stellenwert der Dopplersonographie bei der Betreuung von Nicht–Risikoschwangerschaften am Geburtstermin] Gynakologische Rundschau. 1993;33(1 Suppl):118–9. - PubMed

Additional references

    1. Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Gyte GML, Neilson JP. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009;(Issue 1) [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007529] - PubMed
    1. Barnett SB. Ultrasound safety in obstetrics: What are the concerns? Ultrasound Quarterly. 1995;13(4):228–39.
    1. Barnett SB, Maulik D. Guidelines and recommendations for safe use of Doppler ultrasound in perinatal applications. Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine. 2001;10:75–84. - PubMed
    1. Beattie RB, Dornan JC. Antenatal screening for intrauterine growth retardation with umbilical artery Doppler ultrasonography. BMJ. 1989;298(6674):631–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bernstein IM, Horbar JD, Badger GJ, Ohlsson A, Golan A. Morbidity and mortality among very-low-birth-weight neonates with intrauterine growth restriction. The Vermont Oxford Network. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2000;182:198–206. - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

    1. Bricker L, Neilson JP. Routine Doppler ultrasound in pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007;(Issue 2) [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001450.pub2] - PubMed

    1. * Indicates the major publication for the study

LinkOut - more resources