Quantifying dysphonia severity using a spectral/cepstral-based acoustic index: Comparisons with auditory-perceptual judgements from the CAPE-V
- PMID: 20687828
- DOI: 10.3109/02699206.2010.492446
Quantifying dysphonia severity using a spectral/cepstral-based acoustic index: Comparisons with auditory-perceptual judgements from the CAPE-V
Abstract
This study investigated the relationship between acoustic spectral/cepstral measures and listener severity ratings in normal and disordered voice samples. CAPE-V sentence samples and the vowel /a/were elicited from eight normal speakers and 24 patients with varying degrees of dysphonia severity. Samples were analysed for measures of the cepstral peak prominence (CPP), the ratio of low-to-high spectral energy, and their respective standard deviations. Perceptual ratings of overall severity were also obtained for all samples. Results showed that all acoustic variables combined in a four-factor model which correlated with perceived severity with R = 0.81 (R(2) = 0.65). For the vowel /a/, a five-factor model incorporating all acoustic variables and gender correlated with perceived severity with R = 0.96 (R(2) = 0.91). Results indicate that a strong relationship between perceptual and acoustic estimates of dysphonia severity can be achieved in both continuous speech and vowel contexts using a model incorporating spectral/cepstral measures.
Similar articles
-
Tracking voice change after thyroidectomy: application of spectral/cepstral analyses.Clin Linguist Phon. 2011 Apr;25(4):302-20. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2010.535646. Epub 2010 Dec 15. Clin Linguist Phon. 2011. PMID: 21158501 Clinical Trial.
-
Predictive value and discriminant capacity of cepstral- and spectral-based measures during continuous speech.J Voice. 2013 Jul;27(4):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 May 16. J Voice. 2013. PMID: 23684735
-
Estimating dysphonia severity in continuous speech: application of a multi-parameter spectral/cepstral model.Clin Linguist Phon. 2009 Nov;23(11):825-41. doi: 10.3109/02699200903242988. Clin Linguist Phon. 2009. PMID: 19891523
-
Voice tremor: what we know and what we do not know.Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jun;19(3):155-9. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e328345970c. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011. PMID: 21460728 Review.
-
Routine acoustic voice analysis: time to think again?Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jun;19(3):165-70. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e32834575fe. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011. PMID: 21483265 Review.
Cited by
-
Ambulatory Monitoring of Subglottal Pressure Estimated from Neck-Surface Vibration in Individuals with and without Voice Disorders.Appl Sci (Basel). 2022 Nov 1;12(21):10692. doi: 10.3390/app122110692. Epub 2022 Oct 22. Appl Sci (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36777332 Free PMC article.
-
Male-female specific changes in voice parameters under varying room acoustics.Proc Meet Acoust. 2024 Nov 18;55(1):060001. doi: 10.1121/2.0001979. Epub 2024 Dec 11. Proc Meet Acoust. 2024. PMID: 40092624 No abstract available.
-
Influence of recording instrumentation on measurements of voice in sentence contexts: use of smartphones and tablets.Front Digit Health. 2025 Jul 9;7:1610772. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1610772. eCollection 2025. Front Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 40704366 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Communication Modality on Voice Production.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Sep 15;63(9):2913-2920. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00161. Epub 2020 Aug 6. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020. PMID: 32762517 Free PMC article.
-
High-speed videoendoscopic analysis of relationships between cepstral-based acoustic measures and voice production mechanisms in patients undergoing phonomicrosurgery.Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012 May;121(5):341-7. doi: 10.1177/000348941212100510. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012. PMID: 22724281 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical