Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Dec;51(12):6104-10.
doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4417. Epub 2010 Aug 4.

The effect of bifocal add on accommodative lag in myopic children with high accommodative lag

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The effect of bifocal add on accommodative lag in myopic children with high accommodative lag

David A Berntsen et al. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the effect of a bifocal add and manifest correction on accommodative lag in myopic children with high accommodative lag, who have been reported to have the greatest reduction in myopia progression with progressive addition lenses (PALs).

Methods: Monocular accommodative lag to a 4-D Badal stimulus was measured on two occasions 6 months apart in 83 children (mean ± SD age, 9.9 ± 1.3 years) with high lag randomized to wearing single-vision lenses (SVLs) or PALs. Accommodative lag was measured with the following corrections: habitual, manifest, manifest with +2.00-D add, and habitual with +2.00-D add (6-month visit only).

Results: At baseline, accommodative lag was higher (1.72 ± 0.37 D; mean ± SD) when measured with manifest correction than with habitual correction (1.51 ± 0.50; P < 0.05). This higher lag with manifest correction correlated with a larger amount of habitual undercorrection at baseline (r = -0.29, P = 0.009). A +2.00-D add over the manifest correction reduced lag by 0.45 ± 0.34 D at baseline and 0.33 ± 0.38 D at the 6-month visit. Lag results at 6 months were not different between PAL and SVL wearers (P = 0.92).

Conclusions: A +2.00-D bifocal add did not eliminate accommodative lag and reduced lag by less than 25% of the bifocal power, indicating that children mainly responded to a bifocal by decreasing accommodation. If myopic progression is substantial, measuring lag with full correction can overestimate the hyperopic retinal blur that a child most recently experienced. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00335049.).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mean accommodative lag at the baseline and 6-month visits, by correction type. Error bars, SEM.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Relationship between accommodative lag measured with the manifest correction and the reduction in accommodative lag when a +2.00-D bifocal add was introduced.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Relationship between accommodative lag measured with the habitual correction and the reduction in accommodative lag when a +2.00-D bifocal add was introduced.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rosenfield M, Gilmartin B. eds. Myopia and Nearwork. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998:220
    1. Charman WN. Near vision, lags of accommodation and myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1999;19:126–133 - PubMed
    1. Goss DA, Hampton MJ, Wickham MG. Selected review on genetic factors in myopia. J Am Optom Assoc. 1988;59:875–884 - PubMed
    1. Goss DA, Rainey BB. Relationship of accommodative response and nearpoint phoria in a sample of myopic children. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:292–294 - PubMed
    1. Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Bauer J, Held R. Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:690–694 - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data