Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991;109(1-2):12-9.
doi: 10.1007/BF01405690.

Comparative study of different dorsal stabilization techniques in recent thoraco-lumbar spine fractures

Affiliations

Comparative study of different dorsal stabilization techniques in recent thoraco-lumbar spine fractures

P Eysel et al. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1991.

Abstract

The authors initially outline the development of operative techniques to stabilize traumatic thoraco-lumbar spine fractures. Thereafter their own results in 125 patients, treated operatively between 1.1.1983 and 15.9.1988, are presented. The different techniques (Harrington-instrumentation, transpedicular plate stabilization, fixateur interne) are evaluated. In the clinical neurological examination 25% of the patients experienced an improvement by at least one point in the FRANKEL classification. Four patients suffered neurological deterioration. In the radiological follow-up the "Sintering" process, the kyphotic and scoliotic deformity of the spinal segment were measured. The fixateur interne had the best overall results (loss of reposition averaged a kyphosis of 6.8 degrees, no fracture instability). Less good results were obtained with both the Harrington stabilization (loss of reposition 9.1 degrees, fracture instability in 3 cases) and with the transpedicular plate stabilization (loss of reposition 12.4 degrees, fracture instability in 2 cases). Finally the complications are described. The optimal approach is based on the clinical development. The fusion should be as short as possible with a stable angle implant and the possibility to reposition intraoperatively should be given. Postero-lateral spongiosa application, fusion of the vertebral arch joints, diskectomy with transpedicular spongiosa application and intercorporal blocking should be considered.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Nov-Dec;8(8):817-31 - PubMed
    1. J Trauma. 1985 Mar;25(3):197-202 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1962 Jun;44-A:591-610 - PubMed
    1. Unfallchirurgie. 1986 Apr;12 (2):68-79 - PubMed
    1. Orthopade. 1980 Jan;9(1):63-8 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources