Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Nov;36(11):1836-44.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2014-2. Epub 2010 Aug 6.

Extrapolation from ten sections can make CT-based quantification of lung aeration more practicable

Affiliations

Extrapolation from ten sections can make CT-based quantification of lung aeration more practicable

A W Reske et al. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical applications of quantitative computed tomography (qCT) in patients with pulmonary opacifications are hindered by the radiation exposure and by the arduous manual image processing. We hypothesized that extrapolation from only ten thoracic CT sections will provide reliable information on the aeration of the entire lung.

Methods: CTs of 72 patients with normal and 85 patients with opacified lungs were studied retrospectively. Volumes and masses of the lung and its differently aerated compartments were obtained from all CT sections. Then only the most cranial and caudal sections and a further eight evenly spaced sections between them were selected. The results from these ten sections were extrapolated to the entire lung. The agreement between both methods was assessed with Bland-Altman plots.

Results: Median (range) total lung volume and mass were 3,738 (1,311-6,768) ml and 957 (545-3,019) g, the corresponding bias (limits of agreement) were 26 (-42 to 95) ml and 8 (-21 to 38) g, respectively. The median volumes (range) of differently aerated compartments (percentage of total lung volume) were 1 (0-54)% for the nonaerated, 5 (1-44)% for the poorly aerated, 85 (28-98)% for the normally aerated, and 4 (0-48)% for the hyperaerated subvolume. The agreement between the extrapolated results and those from all CT sections was excellent. All bias values were below 1% of the total lung volume or mass, the limits of agreement never exceeded ± 2%.

Conclusion: The extrapolation method can reduce radiation exposure and shorten the time required for qCT analysis of lung aeration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan 15;175(2):160-6 - PubMed
    1. Crit Care. 2005;9(6):R780-9 - PubMed
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2000 Jul;26(7):857-69 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2006 Apr 27;354(17):1775-86 - PubMed
    1. Chest. 2005 Oct;128(4):2471-7 - PubMed

Publication types