Consumers' views of direct-to-consumer genetic information
- PMID: 20690815
- DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141604
Consumers' views of direct-to-consumer genetic information
Abstract
In this report, we describe the evolution and types of genetic information provided directly to consumers, discuss potential advantages and disadvantages of these products, and review research evaluating consumer responses to direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing. The available evidence to date has focused on predictive tests and does not suggest that individuals, health care providers, or health care systems have been harmed by a DTC provision of genetic information. An understanding of consumer responses to susceptibility tests has lagged behind. The Multiplex Initiative is presented as a case study of research to understand consumers' responses to DTC susceptibility tests. Three priority areas are recommended for accelerated research activities to inform public policy regarding DTC genetic information: (a) exploring consumer's long-term responses to DTC genetic testing on a comprehensive set of outcomes, (b) evaluating optimal services to support decision making about genetic testing, and (c) evaluating best practices in promoting genetic competencies among health providers.
Similar articles
-
Direct-to-consumer advertising of predictive genetic tests: a health belief model based examination of consumer response.Health Mark Q. 2014;31(3):263-78. doi: 10.1080/07359683.2014.936295. Health Mark Q. 2014. PMID: 25120046
-
Genetic gatekeepers: regulating direct-to-consumer genomic services in an era of participatory medicine.Food Drug Law J. 2012;67(4):475-524, iii. Food Drug Law J. 2012. PMID: 24640618
-
The effects of involvement and ad type on attitudes toward direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs.J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2009 Summer;32(1):107-38. J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2009. PMID: 19558035
-
Direct-to-consumer personal genome testing and cancer risk prediction.Cancer J. 2012 Jul-Aug;18(4):293-302. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3182610e38. Cancer J. 2012. PMID: 22846729 Review.
-
Nutrigenomics and ethics interface: direct-to-consumer services and commercial aspects.OMICS. 2008 Dec;12(4):245-50. doi: 10.1089/omi.2008.0049. OMICS. 2008. PMID: 19040371 Review.
Cited by
-
Interest, rationale, and potential clinical applications of genetic testing for mood disorders: a survey of stakeholders.J Affect Disord. 2013 Feb 20;145(2):240-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.05.046. Epub 2012 Sep 28. J Affect Disord. 2013. PMID: 23021819 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Preferences among diseases on a genetic susceptibility test for common health conditions: an ancillary study of the multiplex initiative.Public Health Genomics. 2012;15(6):322-6. doi: 10.1159/000338114. Epub 2012 Jun 8. Public Health Genomics. 2012. PMID: 22688356 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Primary care patients' views and decisions about, experience of and reactions to direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a longitudinal study.J Community Genet. 2013 Oct;4(4):495-505. doi: 10.1007/s12687-013-0156-y. Epub 2013 Jul 7. J Community Genet. 2013. PMID: 23832288 Free PMC article.
-
Tilting at windmills no longer: a data-driven discussion of DTC DNA ancestry tests.Genet Med. 2012 Jun;14(6):586-93. doi: 10.1038/gim.2011.77. Epub 2012 Mar 1. Genet Med. 2012. PMID: 22382803 Free PMC article.
-
State of play in direct-to-consumer genetic testing for lifestyle-related diseases: market, marketing content, user experiences and regulation.Proc Nutr Soc. 2013 Feb;72(1):53-60. doi: 10.1017/S0029665112002960. Proc Nutr Soc. 2013. PMID: 23336560 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources