Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;203(4):391.e1-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.019. Epub 2010 Aug 5.

Complete trisomy 21 vs translocation Down syndrome: a comparison of modes of ascertainment

Affiliations

Complete trisomy 21 vs translocation Down syndrome: a comparison of modes of ascertainment

Eran Bornstein et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the indications for invasive prenatal testing resulting in the detection of translocation Down syndrome and complete trisomy 21.

Study design: This case control study was based on a large amniocentesis and chorionic villi samples database (n = 534,795). All specimens with translocation Down syndrome (n = 203) comprised the translocation group and were compared with a maternal age-matched group (4 to 1, n = 812) in which complete trisomy 21 was detected. Women with a normal karyotype were randomly selected (n = 812) and served as controls. Indications for invasive testing were compared among the 3 paired groups using χ(2) analysis.

Results: There were no differences in the incidence of abnormal first- and second-trimester screening tests between the translocation Down syndrome and the complete trisomy 21 groups. History of prior aneuploidy was significantly more frequent in the translocation Down syndrome group, as compared with either complete trisomy 21 fetuses or normal controls.

Conclusion: Fetuses with translocation Down syndrome present with the same screening abnormalities as fetuses with complete trisomy 21.

PubMed Disclaimer