Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug 27;33(2):241-53.
doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.07.015. Epub 2010 Aug 5.

Follicular helper T cell differentiation requires continuous antigen presentation that is independent of unique B cell signaling

Affiliations

Follicular helper T cell differentiation requires continuous antigen presentation that is independent of unique B cell signaling

Elissa K Deenick et al. Immunity. .

Abstract

Effective humoral immunity depends on the support of B cell responses by T follicular helper (Tfh) cells. Although it has been proposed that Tfh cell differentiation requires T-B interactions, the relative contribution of specific populations of Ag-presenting cells remains unknown. We employed three independent strategies that compromised interactions between CD4(+) T cells and activated B cells in vivo. Whereas the expansion of CD4(+) T cells was relatively unaffected, Tfh cell differentiation was completely blocked in all scenarios. Surprisingly, augmenting antigen presentation by non-B cells rescued Tfh cell differentiation, as determined by surface phenotype, gene expression, and germinal center localization. We conclude that although Ag presentation by responding B cells is typically required for the generation of Tfh cells, this does not result from the provision of a unique B cell-derived signal, but rather because responding B cells rapidly become the primary source of antigen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. SAP deficiency severely compromises the development of Tfh cells
WT or Sh2d1a−/− (SAP KO) OT-II cells were transferred to congenic recipients that were then immunized with OVA plus Alum i.p. (A) the proportion of OT-II cells in the spleen was determined at various times (Mean ± SEM, n=5–14). (B–C) Cells were stained for CXCR5 and PD1 and the number of CXCR5hiPD1hi cells was determined (Mean ± SEM, n=5–14). (C) Contour plots show CXCR5 and PD1 expression on OT-II cells on days 3 (left panel) and 7 (right panel) post-immunization. Cells were stained for CCR7 (D) or ICOS (E). Histograms show CCR7 or ICOS expression on endogenous CD4+ T cells (grey) and OT-II cells (red) after 3 (upper panel) or 7 (lower panel) days. Graphs show relative change in expression of CCR7 and ICOS on OT-II cells compared to endogenous CD4+T cells (Mean ± SEM, n=7–8). (F) Immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections was carried out to determine the positioning of OT-II T cells (CD45.2+) within the follicle (IgD) and T cells zone (CD4) after 3 (left panel) or 7 days (right panel). (G) Further staining confirmed positioning within the GC (PNA) at day 7.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Rescuing germinal centre formation does not facilitate Tfh cell development from SAP-deficient CD4+ T cells
CD45.1-congenic mice were transferred with CD45.2+ OT-II cells. Mice received either Thy1.1 WT OT-II or Thy1.1+ SAP KO OT-II alone or a combination of equal numbers of Thy1.1 WT OT-II or Thy1.1+ SAP KO OT-II and were then immunized i.p with OVA plus Alum. The responses were examined 7 days later. (A) The proportion of IgG1+GL7+ (GC) B cells in recipient spleens. (B) The proportion of OT-II cells from each donor was determined – WT OT-II: filled bars, SAP KO OT-II: open bars. (C) The proportion of CXCR5hiPD1hi Tfh cells from each donor was determined. All graphs show Mean ± SEM, n=4 (D) Contour plots show expression of CXCR5 and PD1 on OT-II cells of each genotype.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Treatment with peptide can rescue Tfh cell development from SAP-deficient T cells
WT or SAP KO OT-II cells were transferred to congenic recipients that were then given OVA plus Alum i.p. at day 0. On day 3 some mice received additional OVA peptide i.v. and the mice then sacrificed on day 7. (A) The proportion of total OT-II cells in the spleen. (B) The proportion of CXCR5hiPD1hi Tfh OT-II cells was determined by (C) staining for CXCR5 and PD1 on OT-II cells. (D) Proportion of GC B cells as determined by staining for expression of GL7 and Fas. (E) Expression of CD62L and PD1 on OT-II cells. (F) Percentage of OT-II cells that are CD62Llo. (G) Expression of CD127 and PD1 on OT-II cells. (H) Percentage of cells OT-II cells that are CD127lo. All graphs show Mean±SEM, n=7–9, except (F) n=4–6. (I) Immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections was performed to determine the positioning of OT-II T cells (CD45.2+) within the follicle (IgD) and GC (PNA). (J-M) CD62Lhi, CD62LloPD1lo and CD62LloPD1hi populations of OT-II CD4+ T cells (CD4+B220CD45.2+) were isolated by sorting. Expression of Bcl6 (K), Il21 (L) and Sh2d1a (M) in each of these populations was then determined by quantitative PCR. N.D. - Not done. The values represent the (Mean±SEM of 4 experiments for peptide boost, 3 experiments for non-boost).
Figure 4
Figure 4. B cell activation via CD40 is not required for Tfh development
Chimeras were generated as described in Experimental Procedures (see also Figure S4A) using 80:20 mix of µMT:Cd40−/− BM (to generate mice with B cells lacking CD40) or B6: Cd40−/− BM (controls). Thy1.1+ WT OT-II cells were transferred into the chimeras, which were then given OVA plus Alum i.p. at day 0. On day 3 some mice received additional OVA peptide i.v. and the mice were sacrificed on day 7 for analysis. (A) Reconstitution was determined by staining B cells (B220+) and DC (CD11c+) for CD40 expression. (B) The proportion of total OT-II cells in the spleen. (C) The proportion of CXCR5hiPD1hi Tfh OT-II cells was determined by (D) staining for CXCR5 and PD1 on OT-II cells. (E) Proportion of GC B cells as assessed by staining for expression of GL7 and Fas. (F) Percentage of cells OT-II cells that are CD127lo. All plots show Mean ± SEM, n=7–14.
Figure 5
Figure 5. B cell Ag-presentation is not required for Tfh development
Chimeras were generated as described in Experimental Procedures using 80:20 mix of µMT:MHCII−/− BM (to generate mice with B cells lacking MHC class II) or B6:MHCII−/− BM (controls). Thy1.1+ WT OT-II cells were transferred into the chimeras, which were then given OVA plus Alum i.p. at day 0. On day 3 some mice received additional OVA peptide i.v. and the mice were sacrificed on day 7 for analysis. (A) Reconstitution was determined by staining B cells (B220+) and DC (CD11c+) for MHCII expression. (B) The proportion of total OT-II cells in the spleen. (C) The proportion of CXCR5hiPD1hi Tfh OT-II cells was determined by (D) staining for CXCR5 and PD1 on OT-II cells. (E) Proportion of GC B cells as assessed by staining for expression of GL7 and Fas. (F) Percentage of cells OT-II cells that are CD127lo. All plots show Mean ± SEM, n=6–8.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Peptide boost prolongs Ag-presentation by DC
Mice were given Alum or OVA plus Alum i.p. at day 0. At day 4 mice some mice received additional OVA peptide i.v. On day 6 the mice were sacrificed and spleens removed. CD11c+ cells were isolated by cell sorting and were placed in culture with CFSE-labeled OT-II cells to detect presentation of OVA peptide. Cultures were harvested 3 days later and OT-II cells identified by staining for CD4. (A) Representative CFSE profiles of OT-II cells. (B) Plots show percentage of cells that are in division (Mean ± range of two experiments).
Figure 7
Figure 7. Effect of peptide boost on B cell responses
WT congenic mice received WT or SAP KO OT-II cells in combination with WT SWHEL cells. Mice were immunized i.p. with OVA plus Alum and i.v. with HEL2X-OVApep. Some mice received additional peptide at Day3 and 6. Mice were sacrificed at day 10 and spleens removed. (A) The proportions of total OT-II cells and (B) CXCR5hiPD1hi Tfh OT-II cells were determined. (C) Splenocytes were stained for CD45.1 and CD45.2 to detect donor cells and the proportion of total HEL-binders was determined by staining with HELWT. (D) The titers of anti-HEL IgG1 in the serum were measured by ELISA against HELWT (E) The proportion of IgG1-switched cells of high affinity was determined by staining for with HEL3X. Plots show donor SWHEL cells (gated using CD45.1 and CD45.2) that are IgG1+. Numbers show proportion of cells that bind HEL3X with high affinity (i.e. cells that have undergone affinity maturation). (F) Graphs show proportion of IgG1+ SWHEL cells that had undergone affinity maturation (numbers are expressed relative to the average of non-boosted controls in each experiment). (G) The degree of affinity matured anti-HEL in the serum was determined by coating plates with HEL4X. All plots show mean ± SEM of at least 12 animals combined from multiple experiments.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aicher A, Hayden-Ledbetter M, Brady WA, Pezzutto A, Richter G, Magaletti D, Buckwalter S, Ledbetter JA, Clark EA. Characterization of human inducible costimulator ligand expression and function. J Immunol. 2000;164:4689–4696. - PubMed
    1. Akiba H, Takeda K, Kojima Y, Usui Y, Harada N, Yamazaki T, Ma J, Tezuka K, Yagita H, Okumura K. The role of ICOS in the CXCR5+ follicular B helper T cell maintenance in vivo. J Immunol. 2005;175:2340–2348. - PubMed
    1. Ansel KM, McHeyzer-Williams LJ, Ngo VN, McHeyzer-Williams MG, Cyster JG. In vivo-activated CD4 T cells upregulate CXC chemokine receptor 5 and reprogram their response to lymphoid chemokines. J Exp Med. 1999;190:1123–1134. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armitage RJ, Fanslow WC, Strockbine L, Sato TA, Clifford KN, Macduff BM, Anderson DM, Gimpel SD, Davis-Smith T, Maliszewski CR. Molecular and biological characterization of a murine ligand for CD40. Nature. 1992;357:80–82. - PubMed
    1. Barnden MJ, Allison J, Heath WR, Carbone FR. Defective TCR expression in transgenic mice constructed using cDNA-based alpha- and beta-chain genes under the control of heterologous regulatory elements. Immunol Cell Biol. 1998;76:34–40. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances