Speech perception abilities of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids
- PMID: 2069171
Speech perception abilities of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids
Abstract
The purpose of this experiment was first, to compare the performance of three matched groups of experimental subjects who used either a single-channel cochlear implant, a multichannel cochlear implant, or a two-channel vibrotactile aid on a battery of speech perception measures, and second, to compare the performance of subjects with residual hearing who used hearing aids to that of the three groups of experimental subjects. The results revealed that the subjects using hearing aids achieved the highest scores on all measures. The performance of the group of multichannel implant users was significantly higher than that of the single-channel implant users on tests involving discrimination of speech features, categorization of stress patterns, closed-set identification of familiar words, and identification of common phrases with and without visual cues. The performance of the subjects using 3M/House and Tactaid II devices was similar on all tests except those requiring integration of auditory or tactile cues and visual cues, on which the 3M/House device users achieved significantly higher scores than did the Tactaid II device users.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of multichannel tactile aids and multichannel cochlear implants in children with profound hearing impairments.Am J Otol. 1995 Jan;16(1):8-13. Am J Otol. 1995. PMID: 8579182
-
Speech perception abilities in children with cochlear implants or hearing aids.Am J Otol. 1991;12 Suppl:174-8. Am J Otol. 1991. PMID: 2069178
-
Analysis of the spontaneous speech samples of children with cochlear implants or tactile aids.Am J Otol. 1991;12 Suppl:151-64. Am J Otol. 1991. PMID: 2069176
-
Speech-perception aids for hearing-impaired people: current status and needed research. Working Group on Communication Aids for the Hearing-Impaired.J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Aug;90(2 Pt 1):637-83. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991. PMID: 1939883 Review.
-
Audiological management and performance of adult cochlear-implant patients.Ear Nose Throat J. 1992 Mar;71(3):117-22, 125-8. Ear Nose Throat J. 1992. PMID: 1572270 Review.
Cited by
-
PET imaging of cochlear-implant and normal-hearing subjects listening to speech and nonspeech.Hear Res. 1999 Jun;132(1-2):34-42. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00028-3. Hear Res. 1999. PMID: 10392545 Free PMC article.
-
Why Early Tactile Speech Aids May Have Failed: No Perceptual Integration of Tactile and Auditory Signals.Front Psychol. 2018 May 23;9:767. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00767. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2018. PMID: 29875719 Free PMC article.
-
Article 1: Long-Term outcomes of cochlear implantation in early childhood: Sample characteristics and data collection methods.Ear Hear. 2011 Feb 1;32(1):2S-12S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182014c53. Ear Hear. 2011. PMID: 21479156 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Early Acoustic Hearing on Speech Perception and Language for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Sep 20;62(9):3620-3637. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-H-18-0255. Epub 2019 Sep 13. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019. PMID: 31518517 Free PMC article.
-
Imitative production of rising speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Oct;50(5):1210-27. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/085). J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007. PMID: 17905907 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical