Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Aug;76(2 Suppl 1):S66-73.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.008.

Prognostic factors in penile cancer

Affiliations
Review

Prognostic factors in penile cancer

Vincenzo Ficarra et al. Urology. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: To review the published data concerning the prognostic factors in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

Methods: We performed an extensive literature search using the MEDLINE databases. Multiple "free text" searches were performed, searching for the following terms individually in the fields title and abstract of the records: "squamous cell carcinoma," "penile cancer" and "prognostic factors." The search included all studies published in English until November 2008. All selected reports were classified according to the level of evidence (LE). The final grade of recommendation (GR) was determined by discussion among all panel members of the International Consultation on Penile Cancer in November 2008.

Results: The presence of metastases in the regional lymph nodes is the main factor predicting an unfavorable prognosis for patients with penile SCC (LE 3, GR B). The prognosis varies according to the number of positive lymph nodes, the presence of uni- or bilateral inguinal extension, pelvic node involvement, and the presence of lymph node capsular involvement (LE 3, GR B). The histologic subtype, pathologic extension, histologic grade, and lymphatic and/or venous embolization are the most important variables of the primary tumor predicting for inguinal lymph node involvement (LE 3, GR B).

Conclusions: The use of nomograms will allow for improvements in prognostic accuracy compared with the use of each single variable (LE 3, GR B). The use of molecular prognostic factors in clinical practice awaits additional confirmatory investigation (LE 3, GR B).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources