Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan;57(1):44-54.
doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.05.013. Epub 2010 Aug 6.

Validation of CKD and related conditions in existing data sets: A systematic review

Collaborators, Affiliations

Validation of CKD and related conditions in existing data sets: A systematic review

Morgan E Grams et al. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Accurate classification of individuals with kidney disease is vital to research and public health efforts aimed at improving health outcomes. Our objective is to identify and synthesize published literature evaluating the accuracy of existing data sources related to kidney disease.

Study design: A systematic review of studies seeking to validate the accuracy of the underlying data relevant to kidney disease.

Setting & population: US-based and international studies covering a wide range of both outpatient and inpatient study populations.

Selection criteria for studies: Any English-language study investigating the prevalence or cause of kidney disease, existence of comorbid conditions, or cause of death in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). All definitions and stages of CKD, including end-stage renal disease (ESRD), were accepted.

Index tests: Presence of a kidney disease-related variable in existing data sets, including administrative data sets and disease registries.

Reference tests: Presence of a kidney disease-related variable defined using laboratory criteria or medical record review.

Results: 30 studies were identified. Most studies investigated the accuracy of kidney disease reporting, comparing coded renal disease with that defined using estimated glomerular filtration rate. The sensitivity of coded renal disease varied widely (0.08-0.83). Specificity was higher, with all studies reporting values ≥0.90. Studies evaluating the cause of CKD, comorbid conditions, and cause of death in patients with CKD used ESRD or transplant populations exclusively, and accuracy was highly variable compared with ESRD registry data.

Limitations: Only English-language studies were evaluated.

Conclusions: Given the heterogeneous results of validation studies, a variety of attributes of existing data sources, including the accuracy of individual data items within these sources, should be considered carefully before use in research, quality improvement, and public health efforts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow Chart of Study Selection
Figure 2
Figure 2
Estimates of Sensitivity in Studies Evaluating the Presence of Kidney Disease, by Gold Standard. Abbreviation: eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Conway PH, Clancy C. Comparative-effectiveness research--implications of the Federal Coordinating Council's report. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(4):328–330. - PubMed
    1. Iglehart JK. Prioritizing comparative-effectiveness research--IOM recommendations. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(4):325–328. - PubMed
    1. Coresh J, Selvin E, Stevens LA, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA. 2007;298(17):2038–2047. - PubMed
    1. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(13):1296–1305. - PubMed
    1. Weiner DE, Tighiouart H, Stark PC, et al. Kidney disease as a risk factor for recurrent cardiovascular disease and mortality. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;44(2):198–206. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms