Complications of indwelling venous access lines in the pediatric hematology patient: a prospective comparison of external venous catheters and subcutaneous ports

Abstract

Since 1984, 316 subcutaneous ports (SP) and 339 external venous catheters (EC) [Roko Catheter, The Hospital for Sick Children (HSC)] have been inserted in hematology/oncology patients at HSC. During a 22-month period (July 1987 to April 1989), a committed central line nurse (J.I.) prospectively collected clinical and microbiologic data on 144 consecutive SPs and 130 consecutive ECs. Children with the SP had 0.6 infected lines and 0.7 infectious episodes per 1,000 patient days compared to 2.9 infected lines and 4.3 infectious episodes per 1,000 patient days with the EC (p less than 0.001). This lower infectious complication rate with SP was demonstrated in the entire group of unselected patients and in a cohort of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) receiving intensive chemotherapy, and it was evident in all age groups. In view of the other advantages of SP--normal activity, absence of the need for home maintenance, improved body image, less expense--these data suggest that SPs are the preferred device in pediatric patients and provide effective venous access with acceptable complication rates.