Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010;7(1 Suppl):S33-45.
doi: 10.1177/1740774510373492.

Biobanking, consent, and commercialization in international genetics research: the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium

Mark A Hall  1 , Nancy M P King, Letitia H Perdue, Joan E Hilner, Beena Akolkar, Carla J Greenbaum, Catherine McKeon; T1DGC
Collaborators, Affiliations

Biobanking, consent, and commercialization in international genetics research: the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium

Mark A Hall et al. Clin Trials. 2010.

Abstract

Background: and

Purpose: This article describes several ethical, legal, and social issues typical of international genetics biobanking, as encountered in the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium (T1DGC).

Methods: By studying the examples set and lessons learned from other international biobanking studies and by devoting considerable time and resources to identifying, addressing, and continually monitoring ethical and regulatory concerns, T1DGC was able to minimize the problems reported by some earlier studies.

Conclusions: Several important conclusions can be drawn based on the experience in this study: (1) Basic international standards for research ethics review and informed consent are broadly consistent across developed countries. (2) When consent forms are adapted locally and translated into different languages, discrepancies are inevitable and therefore require prompt central review and resolution before research is initiated. (3) Providing separate 'check-box' consent for different elements of a study creates confusion and may not be essential. (4) Creating immortalized cell lines to aid future research is broadly acceptable, both in the US and internationally. (5) Imposing some limits on the use of stored samples aids in obtaining ethics approvals worldwide. (6) Allowing potential commercial uses of donated samples is controversial in some Asian countries. (7) Obtaining government approvals can be labor-intensive and time-consuming, and can require legal and diplomatic skills.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Maschke KJ. Navigating an ethical patchwork – human gene banks. Nat Biotechnol 2005; 23: 539–45 - PubMed
    1. European Society of Human Genetics Data storage and DNA banking for biomedical research: technical, social, and ethical issues, 2001. Eur J Hum Genet 2003; 11: S8–10 - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Genetic databases: assessing the benefits and the impact on human and patient rights, 2003. Available at: http://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/1842/2447/1/WHOreportGeneticDataba... (accessed 19 October 2009)
    1. National Bioethics Advisory Committee. Research involving human biological materials: ethical issues and policy guidance, 1999. Available at: http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/past_commissions/nbac_biological1.pdf (accessed 19 October 2009)
    1. UNESCO. International declaration on human genetic data. Available at: http://portal.unesco.org/shs/en/ev.php-URL_ID=1882&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_S... (accessed 19 October 2009)

Publication types