Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010;12(2):PCC.09m00831.
doi: 10.4088/PCC.09m00831whi.

What about telepsychiatry? A systematic review

Francisca García-Lizana  1 , Ingrid Muñoz-Mayorga
Affiliations

What about telepsychiatry? A systematic review

Francisca García-Lizana et al. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2010.

Abstract

Background: Mental illness has become a significant worldwide health issue in recent years. There is presently insufficient evidence to definitively determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different health care models. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of videoconferencing in mental illness.

Data sources: Literature searches were performed in Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, and The Cochrane Library Controlled Trial Registry databases (1997-May 2008). A search of the following terms was used: e-health, mental disorders (MeSH term), mental health (MeSH term), mental health services (MeSH term), telecare, teleconsultation, telehome, telemedical, telemedicine, telemental, telepsychiatric, telepsychiatry, televideo, videoconference, and videophone.

Study selection: Type of disease, interventions, and clinical outcomes or patient satisfaction were identified. Exclusion criteria included studies that did not analyze intervention outcomes and studies with a sample size of fewer than 10 cases. Peer review and quality assessment according to Cochrane recommendations were required for inclusion.

Data extraction/synthesis: Of 620 identified articles, 10 randomized controlled trials are included (1,054 patients with various mental disorders). There were no statistically significant differences between study groups for symptoms, quality of life, and patient satisfaction.

Conclusions: There is insufficient scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of telepsychiatry in the management of mental illness, and more research is needed to further evaluate its efficiency. However, there is a strong hypothesis that videoconference-based treatment obtains the same results as face-to-face therapy and that telepsychiatry is a useful alternative when face-to-face therapy is not possible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Literature Selection for the Systematic Review Abbreviation: RCT = randomized controlled trial.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organization. The World Health Report: Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
    1. Kao SC, Lin CE, Chiu NY. A proposed e-care center for mental health interventions. J Psychiatr Pract. 2006;12(3):180–186. - PubMed
    1. Wang PS, Lane M, Olfson M, et al. Twelve-month use of mental health services in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):629–640. - PubMed
    1. Doughty C. Effective models of mental health service provision and workforce configuration in the primary care setting New Zealand Health Technology Assessment (NZHTA) Technical Brief Series. 2006. Available at: http://nzhtachmedsacnz/publications/mental_healthpcpdf.
    1. De Las Cuevas C, Arredondo MT, Cabrera MF, et al. Randomized clinical trial of telepsychiatry through videoconference versus face-to-face conventional psychiatric treatment. Telemed J E Health. 2006;12(3):341–350. - PubMed