Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan;18(1):17-21.
doi: 10.1007/s10140-010-0895-6. Epub 2010 Aug 6.

Accuracy of low-dose chest CT in intensive care patients

Affiliations

Accuracy of low-dose chest CT in intensive care patients

Joakim Börjesson et al. Emerg Radiol. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

In this prospective study, we set out to determine the accuracy of low-dose computerized tomography (LDCT) of the chest in intensive care patients. Fifteen adult intensive care patients were examined with a standard-dose CT protocol (average radiation dose = 6.7 mSv), chosen as the reference standard, followed by a non-contrast-enhanced LDCT protocol (average radiation dose = 0.59 mSv). Each examination was then read by two separate groups of radiologists blinded to both the purpose and the protocol of the study. In the small group examined, the results showed 100% accuracy in the diagnosis of pneumomediastinum, pericardial effusion, and pleural effusion, and 90% accuracy in the diagnosis of pneumothorax and consolidation. There were no false-positive findings, and the few false-negative findings were unlikely to lead to any clinical interventions. Our examination protocol, while providing a tenfold reduction of the radiation dose, nevertheless remained accurate enough for resolving certain clinical questions common in the intensive care patient. Thus, we suggest that protocols aimed at reducing the radiation dose in chest CT could be applied to the intensive care patient for resolving some specific questions, without compromising the diagnostic yield of the examinations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clin Radiol. 2002 Jan;57(1):8-17 - PubMed
    1. Chest. 1990 Jun;97(6):1467-70 - PubMed
    1. J Thorac Imaging. 1996 Summer;11(3):176-86 - PubMed
    1. Acta Radiol. 2010 Apr;51(3):260-70 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Feb;190(2):335-43 - PubMed