The impact of the nursing hours per patient day (NHPPD) staffing method on patient outcomes: a retrospective analysis of patient and staffing data
- PMID: 20696429
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.07.013
The impact of the nursing hours per patient day (NHPPD) staffing method on patient outcomes: a retrospective analysis of patient and staffing data
Abstract
Background: In March 2002 the Australian Industrial Relations Commission ordered the introduction of a new staffing method - nursing hours per patient day (NHPPD) - for implementation in Western Australia public hospitals. This method used a "bottom up" approach to classify each hospital ward into one of seven categories using characteristics such as patient complexity, intervention levels, the presence of high dependency beds, the emergency/elective patient mix and patient turnover. Once classified, NHPPD were allocated for each ward.
Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine the impact of implementing the NHPPD staffing method on 14 nursing-sensitive outcomes: central nervous system complications, wound infections, pulmonary failure, urinary tract infection, pressure ulcer, pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, ulcer/gastritis/upper gastrointestinal bleed, sepsis, physiologic/metabolic derangement, shock/cardiac arrest, mortality, failure to rescue and length of stay.
Design and setting: The research design was an interrupted time series using retrospective analysis of patient and staffing administrative data from three adult tertiary hospitals in metropolitan Perth over a 4-year period.
Sample: All patient records (N=236,454) and nurse staffing records (N=150,925) from NHPPD wards were included.
Results: The study found significant decreases in the rates of nine nursing-sensitive outcomes when examining hospital-level data following implementation of NHPPD; mortality, central nervous system complications, pressure ulcers, deep vein thrombosis, sepsis, ulcer/gastritis/upper gastrointestinal bleed shock/cardiac arrest, pneumonia and average length of stay. At the ward level, significant decreases in the rates of five nursing-sensitive outcomes; mortality, shock/cardiac arrest, ulcer/gastritis/upper gastrointestinal bleed, length of stay and urinary tract infections occurred.
Conclusions: The findings provide evidence to support the continuation of the NHPPD staffing method. They also add to evidence about the importance of nurse staffing to patient safety; evidence that must influence policy. This study is one of the first to empirically review a specific nurse staffing method, based on an individual assessment of each ward to determine staffing requirements, rather than a "one-size-fits-all" approach.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Characteristics of hospital nursing staff and patient outcomes: a commentary on Twigg et al (2010).Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 May;48(5):655-6; discussion 657-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.01.006. Epub 2011 Feb 18. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011. PMID: 21333290 No abstract available.
-
Changes in patient outcomes coincide with increased nursing hours.Evid Based Nurs. 2012 Apr;15(2):53-4. doi: 10.1136/ebn.2011.100142. Epub 2011 Oct 28. Evid Based Nurs. 2012. PMID: 22039203 No abstract available.
-
[New methods of calculating staffing needs adjusted to individual departments: a possible alternative?].Enferm Clin. 2012 Sep-Oct;22(5):275-7. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2012.07.001. Enferm Clin. 2012. PMID: 23089127 Spanish. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
