Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep-Oct;30(5):390-6.
doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.67083.

Validity and reliability of the European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ): experience from Kuwait using a sample of women with breast cancer

Affiliations

Validity and reliability of the European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ): experience from Kuwait using a sample of women with breast cancer

Shafika A Alawadhi et al. Ann Saudi Med. 2010 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Although the EORTC QLQ-C30 and its breast-specific module (BR-23) are widely used instruments, the few reports on their psychometric characteristics from Arab and neighboring countries involved limited analyses. Our objective was to assess the psychometric characteristics of both questionnaires using the responses of a larger sample of Arab women.

Methods: Participants were consecutive clinic attendees at the Kuwait Cancer Control Center. The indices assessed were alpha coefficients, item-internal consistency (IIC), item-discriminant validity (IDV), and known-groups validity.

Results: The 348 women were aged 48.3 (10.3) years. The intra-class correlation for the test-retest statistic and the internal consistency values for the multi-item scales were >0.7 alpha. With the exception of the pain subscale, all items met the IIC criterion of >0.4 correlation with the corresponding scale. For IDV, the BR-23 performed better than the QLQ-C30. The scale scores discriminated between patients at different disease stages, and between sick and well populations.

Conclusion: With the exception of the pain subscale, the Arabic version of the questionnaires is psychometrically sound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Penson RT, Wenzel LB, Vergote I, Cella D. Quality of life considerations in gynecologic cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;95:S247–257. - PubMed
    1. Montazeri A. Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: A bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007. J Expt Clin Cancer Res. 2008;27:32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Awad MA, Denic S, El Taji K. Validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Arabic-speaking populations. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2008;1138:146–154. - PubMed
    1. Awadalla AW, Ohaeri JU, Gholoum A, Khalid AO, Hamad HM, Jacob A. Factors associated with quality of life of outpatients with breast cancer and gynecologic cancers and their family caregivers: a controlled study. BMC Cancer. 2007;7:102. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Montazeri A, Harirchi I, Vahdani M, Khaleghi F, Jarvandi S, Ebrahimi M, et al. The EORTC breast cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-BR23): Translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Qual Life Res. 2000;9:177–184. - PubMed