Electromyographic signal and force comparisons during maximal voluntary isometric contraction in water and on dry land
- PMID: 20697905
- DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1598-0
Electromyographic signal and force comparisons during maximal voluntary isometric contraction in water and on dry land
Abstract
This study was designed to compare surface electromyographic (sEMG) signal and force production during maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVCs) in water and on dry land. The reproducibility of sEMG and isometric force measurements between water and dry land environments was also assessed. Nine women performed MVC for elbow flexion and extension, hip flexion, and extension against identical fixed resistance in both environments. The sEMG signal from biceps brachii, triceps brachii, rectus femoris, and biceps femoris was recorded with waterproof adhesives placed over each electrode. The sEMG and force production showed no significant difference between water and dry land, except for HEX (p = 0.035). In addition, intraclass correlation coefficient values were significant and ranged from moderate to high (0.66-0.96) for sEMG and force production between environments. These results showed that the environment did not influence the sEMG and force in MVC.
Similar articles
-
The influence of Inter-Electrode Distance on the RMS of the SEMG signal.Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Oct-Nov;41(7):437-42. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2001. PMID: 11721300
-
The effects of massed versus distributed contractions on the variability of maximal isometric force.Exp Brain Res. 2014 Jul;232(7):2293-304. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3922-0. Epub 2014 Apr 2. Exp Brain Res. 2014. PMID: 24691759
-
Isometric training with maximal co-contraction instruction does not increase co-activation during exercises against external resistances.J Sports Sci. 2014;32(1):60-9. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2013.805238. Epub 2013 Jul 23. J Sports Sci. 2014. PMID: 23876029
-
Comparison and reproducibility of sEMG during manual muscle testing on land and in water.J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011 Feb;21(1):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.05.004. Epub 2010 Jun 8. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011. PMID: 20965128
-
Sex-related differences in maximal rate of isometric torque development.J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013 Dec;23(6):1289-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Oct 5. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013. PMID: 24148962 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Kinesiological Analysis of Stationary Running Performed in Aquatic and Dry Land Environments.J Hum Kinet. 2015 Dec 30;49:5-14. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0103. eCollection 2015 Dec 22. J Hum Kinet. 2015. PMID: 26839601 Free PMC article.
-
Surface electromyography during physical exercise in water: a systematic review.BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2014 Apr 15;6(1):15. doi: 10.1186/2052-1847-6-15. Online ahead of print. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2014. PMID: 24731774 Free PMC article.
-
Rating of Perceived Exertion and Physiological Responses in Water-Based Exercise.J Hum Kinet. 2015 Dec 30;49:99-108. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0112. eCollection 2015 Dec 22. J Hum Kinet. 2015. PMID: 26839610 Free PMC article.
-
Electromyographic responses during time get up and go test in water (wTUG).Springerplus. 2013 May 10;2(1):217. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-217. Print 2013 Dec. Springerplus. 2013. PMID: 23705108 Free PMC article.
-
A comparison land-water environment of maximal voluntary isometric contraction during manual muscle testing through surface electromyography.BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2013 Dec 16;5(1):28. doi: 10.1186/2052-1847-5-28. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2013. PMID: 24342017 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources