Assessing coronary risk assessment: what's next?
- PMID: 20697964
- PMCID: PMC2947629
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1469-8
Assessing coronary risk assessment: what's next?
Conflict of interest statement
Neither author reports any.
Comment on
-
Coronary risk assessment by point-based vs. equation-based Framingham models: significant implications for clinical care.J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Nov;25(11):1145-51. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1454-2. Epub 2010 Sep 8. J Gen Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20824362 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
Coronary heart disease: acceptance of guideline recommendations irrelevant in Germany?Fam Pract. 2003 Jun;20(3):350. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmg318. Fam Pract. 2003. PMID: 12738707 No abstract available.
-
Practice patterns related to the Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines in primary care.Am J Cardiol. 2002 Sep 15;90(6):687. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02739-x. Am J Cardiol. 2002. PMID: 12231113 No abstract available.
-
Changing from CHD to CVD risk-based guidelines for the management of mild uncomplicated hypertension in different ethnic groups: implications for primary care.J Hum Hypertens. 2005 Apr;19(4):321-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001829. J Hum Hypertens. 2005. PMID: 15674404 No abstract available.
-
Cardiovascular disease in women: what's different? What's new? What's unresolved?Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994 Dec 30;736:147-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb12827.x. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994. PMID: 7710201 Review. No abstract available.
-
Using nontraditional risk factors in coronary heart disease risk assessment.Am Fam Physician. 2011 Feb 15;83(4):449. Am Fam Physician. 2011. PMID: 21322521 Review. No abstract available.
References
-
- Anderson KM, Wilson PW, Odell PM, Kannel WB. An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals. Circulation. 1991;83:356–362. - PubMed
-
- Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998;97:1837–1847. - PubMed