Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010:2010:594687.
doi: 10.1155/2010/594687. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

Applicability of the Filter Paper Technique for Detection of Antifilarial IgG(4) Antibodies Using the Bm14 Filariasis CELISA

Affiliations

Applicability of the Filter Paper Technique for Detection of Antifilarial IgG(4) Antibodies Using the Bm14 Filariasis CELISA

Hayley M Joseph et al. J Parasitol Res. 2010.

Abstract

Demonstration of successful elimination of lymphatic filariasis (LF) in endemic countries requires sensitive diagnostics for accurate definitions of endpoints and future surveillance. There has been interest in complementing available diagnostics with antibody serology testing in children, since negative serology would correspond with cessation of LF transmission. The Filariasis CELISA detects antifilarial IgG(4) and has favourable results with serum samples but field application requires an easier sampling method. Ninety-four paired plasma and filter paper samples were assayed with promising results. The filter paper method resulted in a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 77% when compared to the paired plasma. One hundred and one filter paper samples were assessed for storage effects. Following 10-month storage at -20( degrees )C there was a significant reduction in reactivity (P < .001). Overall the results indicated that filter paper sampling would be a favourable sensitive and specific alternative for blood collection in surveys.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Reactivity of eluates from 45 individuals living in a nonendemic LF area. All of the samples had OD absorbance values lower than the positive cut-off  value of  0.400 and were all considered nonreactive. The average OD absorbance value was 0.08.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weil GJ, Ramzy RMR. Diagnostic tools for filariasis elimination programs. Trends in Parasitology. 2007;23(2):78–82. - PubMed
    1. Huppatz C, Durrheim D, Lammie P, Kelly P, Melrose W. Eliminating lymphatic filariasis—the surveillance challenge. Tropical Medicine and International Health. 2008;13(3):292–294. - PubMed
    1. Sasa M. Human Filariasis: A Global Survey of Epidemiology and Control. Baltimore, Md, USA: University Park Press; 1976.
    1. Gao CL, Cao WC, Chen XX. Changes in anti-filarial antibody after control of filariasis in Shandong Province. Chinese Medical Journal. 1994;107(5):360–363. - PubMed
    1. Melrose WD, Durrheim DD, Burgess GW. Update on immunological tests for lymphatic filariasis. Trends in Parasitology. 2004;20(6):255–257. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources