Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep;7(3):205-210.
doi: 10.1007/s10397-010-0589-9. Epub 2010 May 22.

Hysterectomy or a minimal invasive alternative? A systematic review on quality of life and satisfaction

Hysterectomy or a minimal invasive alternative? A systematic review on quality of life and satisfaction

H A M Brölmann et al. Gynecol Surg. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

Nowadays, an increasing number of minimal invasive treatment alternatives to hysterectomy may be offered to the patient. In determining the appropriate treatment option, the patient has a distinct dilemma if a minimal invasive treatment with lesser effect than hysterectomy should be chosen or if a hysterectomy should be chosen which is a major surgery and requires longer recovery than the minimal invasive alternative. Quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaires that take subjective health perception into account are currently used to assess the treatment effects. The objective of this literature study is to determine and discuss the role of QoL as an outcome in randomized controlled trials (RCT) or systematic reviews of RCTs that study the treatment effect of hysterectomy compared to that of minimal invasive alternatives. A systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed database and in the Cochrane database to find randomized trials and systematic reviews of randomized trials, comparing hysterectomy with minimal invasive or conservative treatment options with sufficient follow-up using satisfaction, health status, and quality of life as outcomes. The results were based on nine randomized trials and two systematic reviews. The differences are mostly in favor of hysterectomy. In two out of four studied treatment alternatives, the satisfaction or health status is different in favor of hysterectomy while the QoL is equivalent. After 2 years of follow-up, differences between both groups have disappeared, possibly because of the crossover effect. Possible reasons for the lesser response of QoL compared to satisfaction or health status are discussed. The fundamental question if patients have a better quality of life at all times if they choose for a minimal invasive alternative of hysterectomy remains unresolved. Information, individualization, and freedom of choice before surgery probably best serve the sense of well being and quality of life thereafter.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Constitution of the World Health Organization (WHO) Handbook of basic documents. Geneva: WHO; 1952. pp. 3–20.
    1. Testa MA. Interpretation of quality-of-life outcomes: issues that affect magnitude and meaning. Med Care. 2000;38:II166–II174. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200009002-00026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lethaby A, Shepperd S, Cooke I, Farquhar C (2000) Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD000329 - PubMed
    1. Marjoribanks J, Lethaby A, Farquhar C (2006) Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev; CD003855 - PubMed
    1. Kuppermann M, Varner RE, Summitt RL, Jr, Learman LA, Ireland C, Vittinghoff E, Stewart AL, Lin F, Richter HE, Showstack J, Hulley SB, Washington AE. Effect of hysterectomy vs medical treatment on health-related quality of life and sexual functioning: the medicine or surgery (Ms) randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;291:1447–1455. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.12.1447. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources