Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct 15;285(42):32075-86.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.130435. Epub 2010 Aug 11.

Role of H-1 and H-2 subunits of soybean seed ferritin in oxidative deposition of iron in protein

Affiliations

Role of H-1 and H-2 subunits of soybean seed ferritin in oxidative deposition of iron in protein

Jianjun Deng et al. J Biol Chem. .

Abstract

Naturally occurring phytoferritin is a heteropolymer consisting of two different H-type subunits, H-1 and H-2. Prior to this study, however, the function of the two subunits in oxidative deposition of iron in ferritin was unknown. The data show that, upon aerobic addition of 48-200 Fe(2+)/shell to apoferritin, iron oxidation occurs only at the diiron ferroxidase center of recombinant H1 (rH-1). In addition to the diiron ferroxidase mechanism, such oxidation is catalyzed by the extension peptide (a specific domain found in phytoferritin) of rH-2, because the H-1 subunit is able to remove Fe(3+) from the center to the inner cavity better than the H-2 subunit. These findings support the idea that the H-1 and H-2 subunits play different roles in iron mineralization in protein. Interestingly, at medium iron loading (200 irons/shell), wild-type (WT) soybean seed ferritin (SSF) exhibits a stronger activity in catalyzing iron oxidation (1.10 ± 0.13 μm iron/subunit/s) than rH-1 (0.59 ± 0.07 μm iron/subunit/s) and rH-2 (0.48 ± 0.04 μm iron/subunit/s), demonstrating that a synergistic interaction exists between the H-1 and H-2 subunits in SSF during iron mineralization. Such synergistic interaction becomes considerably stronger at high iron loading (400 irons/shell) as indicated by the observation that the iron oxidation activity of WT SSF is ∼10 times larger than those of rH-1 and rH-2. This helps elucidate the widespread occurrence of heteropolymeric ferritins in plants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
A, time course of rH-2 aggregation during Fe2+ oxidation. B, time course of rH-2 or EP-deleted rH-2 aggregation upon the addition of Fe2+ or Fe3+. The curve represents an average of six experimental measurements. C, relative scattered light intensity distribution curves for aporH-2 and aporH-2 plus Fe2+ ion. Conditions were as follows: [aporH-2] = 0.5 μm in 100 mm Mops (pH 7.0), 24–100 μm FeSO4, 25 °C.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
A, time course of rH-1 aggregation during Fe2+ oxidation. B, time course of rH-1 or EP-deleted rH-1 aggregation upon the addition of Fe2+ or Fe3+. The curve represents an average of six experimental measurements. C, relative scattered light intensity distribution curves for aporH-1 and aporH-1 plus Fe2+ ion. Conditions were as follows: [aporH-1] = 0.5 μm in 100 mm Mops (pH 7.0), 24–250 μm FeSO4, 25 °C.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
MS profiles of EP-1 (A) and EP-2 (B) treated with FeCl3 (Fe3+/EP ratio = 10:1) acquired by MALDI-TOF-MS. Conditions were as follows: [EP-1 or EP-2] = 140 μm in 5 mm Mops, pH 7.0.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
A, time course of WT SSF aggregation during Fe2+ oxidation. B, time course of WT SSF or EP-deleted SSF aggregation upon the addition of Fe2+ or Fe3+. The curve represents an average of six experimental measurements. C, relative scattered light intensity distribution curves for apoSSF and apoSSF plus Fe2+ ion. Conditions were as follows: [WT SSF] = 0.5 μm in 100 mm Mops (pH 7.0), 24–100 μm FeSO4, 25 °C.
FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.
A, regeneration of oxidation activities in rH-1, rH-2, and WT SSF as normalized initial rates. Each injection is half-saturation of the ferroxidase sites, 1 Fe2+/site. Conditions were as follows: [aporH-1, aporH-2, or WT apoSSF] = 2.0 μm in 0.15 m NaCl and 100 mm Mops, pH 7.0, 25 °C, time intervals between injections 3 min. Error bars, S.E. B, change of relative fluorescence intensity of apoferritin after the aerobic addition of 48 Fe2+ atoms/shell. Conditions were as follows: λex = 280 nm, λem = 325 nm, [aporH-1, aporH-2, or WT apoSSF] = 0.5 μm in 0.15 m NaCl and 0.1 m Mops, pH 7.0, 25 °C.
FIGURE 6.
FIGURE 6.
Time course of the formation and dissociation of rH-1 (A), rH-2 (B), and WT SSF (C) aggregates during the oxidative deposition of iron in the protein shell. The curve represents an average of six independent experimental measurements. Conditions were as follows: [aporH-1, aporH-2, or WT apoSSF] = 0.5 μm in 100 mm Mops (pH 7.0), 200 μm Fe2+, 25 °C.
FIGURE 7.
FIGURE 7.
Kinetic curves of the formation and dissociation of rH-1 (A), rH-2 (B), and WT SSF (C) aggregates during the oxidative deposition of iron in the protein shell. The curve represents an average of six independent experimental measurements. Conditions were as follows: 0.5 μm apoferritin in 100 mm Mops (pH 7.0), 72 μm Fe3+, 25 °C.
FIGURE 8.
FIGURE 8.
Kinetic curves of Fe2+ oxidation by O2 in aporH-1, aporH-2, WT apoSSF, and aporH-1H-2 at different Fe2+ concentrations, 48 (A), 200 (B), and 400 Fe2+/shell (C). Conditions were as follows: final [aporH-1, aporH-2, aporH-1H-2, or WT apoSSF] = 0.5 μm in 100 mm Mops (pH 7.0), 24–200 μm FeSO4, 25 °C.
REACTION 1
REACTION 1

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Harrison P. M., Arosio P. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1275, 161–203 - PubMed
    1. Le Brun N. E., Crow A., Murphy M. E., Mauk A. G., Moore G. R. (2010) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1800, 732–744 - PubMed
    1. Zhao G., Ceci P., Ilari A., Giangiacomo L., Laue T. M., Chiancone E., Chasteen N. D. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 27689–27696 - PubMed
    1. Solomon E. I., Brunold T. C., Davis M. I., Kemsley J. N., Lee S. K., Lehnert N., Neese F., Skulan A. J., Yang Y. S., Zhou J. (2000) Chem. Rev. 100, 235–350 - PubMed
    1. Kopp D. A., Lippard S. J. (2002) Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 6, 568–576 - PubMed

Publication types