Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;24(10):1988-97.
doi: 10.1210/me.2010-0115. Epub 2010 Aug 11.

Endogenous activation of glucokinase by 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase is glucose dependent

Affiliations

Endogenous activation of glucokinase by 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase is glucose dependent

Sara Langer et al. Mol Endocrinol. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Glucokinase (GK) plays a crucial role as glucose sensor in glucose-induced insulin secretion in pancreatic β-cells. The bifunctional enzyme 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase (PFK-2/FBPase-2) acts as an endogenous GK activator. Therefore, the goal of this study was the analysis of GK-PFK-2/FBPase-2 complex formation and its effect on metabolic stimulus-secretion coupling in β-cells in dependence upon glucose. The interaction between GK and PFK-2/FBPase-2 was analyzed in insulin-secreting MIN6 cells with a new fluorescence-based mammalian two-hybrid system. In contrast to the commonly used mammalian two-hybrid systems that require sampling before detection, the system used allows monitoring of the effects of environmental changes on protein-protein interactions on the single-cell level. Increasing the glucose concentration in the cell culture medium from 3 to 10 and 25 mmol/liter amplified the interaction between the enzymes stepwise. Importantly, in line with these results, overexpression of PFK-2/FBPase-2 in MIN6 cells evoked only at 10 and 25 mmol/liter, an increase in insulin secretion. Furthermore, a PFK-2/FBPase-2 mutant with an abolished GK-binding motif neither showed a glucose-dependent GK binding nor was able to increase insulin secretion. The results obtained with the mammalian two-hybrid system could be confirmed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments in COS cells. Furthermore, the established interaction between GK and the liver GRP served in all experiments as a control. Thus, this study clearly showed that binding and activation of GK by PFK-2/FBPase-2 in β-cells is promoted by glucose, resulting in an enhancement of insulin secretion at stimulatory glucose concentrations, without affecting basal insulin secretion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Glucose-dependent modulation of GK binding to the GRP. The interaction strength of the fusion proteins DNA-BD-GRP and AD-GK was measured in a fluorescence-based mammalian two-hybrid assay. DNA-BD and AD-GK (white bars) or DNA-BD-GRP and AD (dashed bars) or DNA-BD-GRP and AD-GK (black bars) were coexpressed in COS cells. The cells were preincubated in the presence of 5 mmol/liter or 25 mmol/liter glucose. Thereafter, the fluorescence intensities of ECFP and EYFP were determined. Data are expressed as means ± sem of three to five individual experiments with a total of 142–266 nuclei analyzed. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 compared with negative controls; ##, P < 0.01 compared with cells incubated with 5 mmol/liter glucose (ANOVA/Bonferroni’s test).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Glucose promoted binding of islet PFK-2/FBPase-2 to GK. The interaction strength of the fusion proteins DNA-BD-PFK-2/FBPase-2 or DNA-BD-PFK-2/FBPase-2-Mut and AD-GK was measured in a fluorescence-based mammalian two-hybrid assay in insulin-secreting MIN6 cells. A, DNA-BD-PFK-2/FBPase-2 and AD (white bars) or DNA-BD-PFK-2/FBPase-2 and AD-GK (black bars) were coexpressed in MIN6 cells and preincubated with 3 mmol/liter or 25 mmol/liter glucose. Thereafter, the fluorescence intensities for ECFP and EYFP were determined. Data are expressed as means ± sem of three individual experiments with a total of 60–70 nuclei analyzed. **, P < 0.01 compared with negative control (ANOVA/Bonferroni’s test). B, DNA-BD-PFK-2/FBPase-2 and AD-GK (black bars) or DNA-BD-PFK-2/FBPase-2-Mut and AD-GK (gray bars) were coexpressed in MIN6 cells and preincubated with 3 mmol/liter or 25 mmol/liter glucose. Thereafter, the fluorescence intensities for ECFP and EYFP were determined. Data are expressed as means ± sem of three individual experiments with a total of 44–152 nuclei analyzed. *, P < 0.05 compared with cells incubated with 3 mmol/liter glucose; #, P < 0.05 compared with DNA-BD-PFK-2/FBPase-2 wild type (ANOVA/Bonferroni’s test).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
The interaction strength between GK and PFK-2/FBPase-2 rises with increasing glucose concentrations. The interaction of the fusion proteins DNA-BD-PFK-2/FBPase-2 and AD-GK was measured in a semiautomated fluorescence-based mammalian two-hybrid assay. DNA-BD-PFK-2/FBPase-2 and AD (dashed line in A and white bars in B) or DNA-BD-PFK-2/FBPase-2 and AD-GK (solid line in A and black bars in B) were coexpressed in insulin-secreting MIN6 cells. In cells cultured at 3, 10, or 25 mmol/liter glucose, respectively, the degree of interaction between DNA-BD and AD proteins was analyzed every hour as the mean value for the nuclear EYFP/ECFP ratio. A, Images were taken hourly over a period of 40 h. The time lapse of the calculated EYFP/ECFP ratio is exemplary, shown for a representative single experiment for the interaction of GK with islet PFK-2/FBPase-2 at 25 mmol/liter glucose (solid line) together with the respective negative control at 25 mmol/liter glucose (dashed line). Data are expressed as means ± sem of 2–120 nuclei analyzed per time point. B, The mean nuclear EYFP/ECFP ratios obtained between 36 and 48 h after transfection were determined together with the respective sem for 341–1369 cells per sample. The means ± sem of the EYFP/ECFP ratio are shown for three to five independent experiments with a total of 1331–5905 nuclei analyzed. *, P < 0.05 compared with negative control, #, P < 0.05 compared with cells incubated with 3 mmol/liter glucose (ANOVA/Bonferroni’s test).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Effect of low vs. high glucose on colocalization between GK and islet PFK-2/FBPase-2. ECFP-GK and EYFP-PFK-2/FBPase-2 or EYFP-PFK-2/FBPase-2-Mut fusion proteins were co-overexpressed in COS cells and precultured in medium containing 3 mmol/liter or 25 mmol/liter glucose, respectively. Fluorescence images were taken, and the degree of colocalization was calculated with the Imaris software (Bitplane). A typical image overlay of one cell co-overexpressing ECFP-GK and EYFP-PFK-2/FBPase-2 incubated at 3 mmol/liter glucose (A) and one at 25 mmol/liter glucose (B) is shown with the associated correlation diagram. ECFP-GK is depicted in green and EYFP-PFK-2/FBPase-2 is shown in red. C, Colocalization of ECFP-GK and EYFP-PFK-2/FBPase-2 (black bars), and of ECFP-GK and EYFP-PFK-2/FBPase-2-Mut (gray bars) is expressed as means ± sem of three individual experiments with a total of five to eight cells analyzed.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Effect of low vs. high glucose on FRET between GK and its binding partners GRP and islet PFK-2/FBPase-2. Fluorescent proteins were coexpressed in COS cells and precultured with the indicated glucose concentrations. Thereafter, fluorescence images were taken in living cells, and the sensitized emission-based FRET efficiency (FRETN) was calculated from the ECFP and EYFP emission intensities. A, FRETN between separately expressed ECFP and EYFP (white bars) or the fluorescent fusion protein ECFP-EYFP (black bars). B, FRETN between EYFP-GRP and ECFP (white bars) or ECFP-GK (black bars). C, FRETN between EYFP-PFK-2/FBPase-2 and ECFP (white bars) or ECFP-GK (black bars), and between EYFP-PFK-2/FBPase-2-Mut and ECFP (dashed bars) or ECFP-GK (gray bars). Data are expressed as means ± sem of three individual experiments with a total of 8–22 cells analyzed. *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001 compared with negative control; ###, P < 0.001 compared with cells incubated with 3 mmol/liter or 5 mmol/liter glucose; §§§, P < 0.001 compared with EYFP-PFK-2/FBPase-2 wild type, respectively (panel A, Student’s t test; panels B and C, ANOVA/Bonferroni’s test).
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Effect of islet PFK-2/FBPase-2 on glucose-induced insulin secretion. Insulin-secreting MIN6 cells were transfected with EYFP (white bars), EYFP-PFK-2/FBPase-2 (black bars), or EYFP-PFK-2/FBPase-2-Mut (gray bars) and cultured for 48 h. Cells were starved for 1 h and thereafter stimulated for 1 h with 3, 10, or 25 mmol/liter glucose, respectively. Insulin secretion is shown as insulin secreted per cellular insulin content and protein. Data are expressed as means ± sem of four individual experiments. *, P < 0.05 compared with negative control; #, P < 0.05; ##, P < 0.01 compared with EYFP-PFK-2/FBPase-2-Mut stimulated with the same glucose concentration (ANOVA/Bonferroni’s test).

References

    1. Baltrusch S, Tiedge M2006. Glucokinase regulatory network in pancreatic β-cells and liver. Diabetes 55(Suppl 2):S55–S64
    1. Lenzen S, Panten U1988. Signal recognition by pancreatic B-cells. Biochem Pharmacol 37:371–378 - PubMed
    1. Matschinsky F, Liang Y, Kesavan P, Wang L, Froguel P, Velho G, Cohen D, Permutt MA, Tanizawa Y, Jetton TL, Niswender K, Magnuson MA1993. Glucokinase as pancreatic β cell glucose sensor and diabetes gene. J Clin Invest 92:2092–2098 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meglasson MD, Matschinsky FM1984. New perspectives on pancreatic islet glucokinase. Am J Physiol 246:E1–E13 - PubMed
    1. Matschinsky FM1996. Banting Lecture 1995. A lesson in metabolic regulation inspired by the glucokinase glucose sensor paradigm. Diabetes 45:223–241 - PubMed

Publication types