Improved testing for microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer using a simplified 3-marker assay
- PMID: 20703819
- PMCID: PMC3269820
- DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1147-4
Improved testing for microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer using a simplified 3-marker assay
Abstract
Background: In colorectal cancer (CRC), microsatellite instability (MSI) is a valuable marker of defective DNA mismatch repair that identifies cancers with distinct phenotypic properties, including favorable survival. However, the optimal assay for MSI status is unknown. We have evaluated a simplified 3-marker assay for MSI and compared it with the 5-marker (NCI) assay to see if technical variations in MSI testing are important.
Materials and methods: DNA samples from 357 CRCs were evaluated for MSI using the 5 microsatellite markers recommended for the NCI assay (BAT 25, BAT26, D2S123, D5S346, and D17S250). Results were compared with a simplified 3-marker assay (BAT25, BAT26, and D2S123). CRCs identified as MSI were evaluated for their clinical, pathological, and genetic characteristics.
Results: The 5-marker assay identified 96 cancers as MSI. Only 56 of these were MSI by the 3-marker assay (3-marker+ group), leaving 40 cases identified as MSI only by NCI criteria (3-marker- group). The remaining 261 cancers were microsatellite stable (MSS). The 3-marker+ MSI tumors had features characteristic of MSI tumors: more proximal, poorly differentiated, associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), more BRAF mutations, fewer KRAS mutations, better 5-year disease-specific survival, more frequent mismatch repair (MMR) protein loss, and less likely to be metastatic on presentation (P < .05). Chromosomal arm loss was observed only in 3-marker- MSI and MSS cancers (P < .05).
Conclusion: The 3-marker MSI assay outperforms the traditional 5-marker assay for identifying patients with favorable prognosis and homogeneous clinical and genetic features. More accurate MSI testing should improve prognostic and predictive scoring systems for colorectal cancer.
Figures


References
-
- Nash GM, Gimbel M, Shia J, Culliford AT, Nathanson DR, Ndubuisi M, et al. Automated, multiplex assay for high-frequency microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:3105–12. - PubMed
-
- Gryfe R. Clinical implications of our advancing knowledge of colorectal cancer genetics: Inherited syndromes, prognosis, prevention, screening and therapeutics. Surg Clin N Am. 2006;86:787–817. - PubMed
-
- Sinicrope FA, Rego RL, Halling KC, Foster N, Sargent DJ, La Plant B, et al. Prognostic impact of microsatellite instability and DNA ploidy in human colon carcinoma patients. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:729–37. - PubMed
-
- Laghi L, Bianchi P, Malesci A. Differences and evolution of the methods for the assessment of microsatellite instability. Oncogene. 2008;27:6313–21. - PubMed
-
- O'Dwyer PJ. [Accessed 12 February 2009];Oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil with or without bevacizumab in treating patients who have undergone surgery for stage II colon cancer; 2008. Available: http://www. clinicaltrials.gov.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous