Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):317-39.
doi: 10.3322/caac.20081. Epub 2010 Aug 13.

Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: meta-analysis of randomized trials

Laurel L Northouse  1 , Maria C Katapodi, Lixin Song, Lingling Zhang, Darlene W Mood
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: meta-analysis of randomized trials

Laurel L Northouse et al. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Family caregivers of cancer patients receive little preparation, information, or support to perform their caregiving role. However, their psychosocial needs must be addressed so they can maintain their own health and provide the best possible care to the patient. The purpose of this article is to analyze the types of interventions offered to family caregivers of cancer patients, and to determine the effect of these interventions on various caregiver outcomes. Meta-analysis was used to analyze data obtained from 29 randomized clinical trials published from 1983 through March 2009. Three types of interventions were offered to caregivers: psychoeducational, skills training, and therapeutic counseling. Most interventions were delivered jointly to patients and caregivers, but they varied considerably with regard to dose and duration. The majority of caregivers were female (64%) and Caucasian (84%), and ranged in age from 18 to 92 years (mean age, 55 years). Meta-analysis indicated that although these interventions had small to medium effects, they significantly reduced caregiver burden, improved caregivers' ability to cope, increased their self-efficacy, and improved aspects of their quality of life. Various intervention characteristics were also examined as potential moderators. Clinicians need to deliver research-tested interventions to help caregivers and patients cope effectively and maintain their quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Selection Process of Randomized Trials
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Effect Sizes for Caregiving Burden
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Effect Sizes for Caregiving Benefit
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Effect Sizes for Information Needs
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Effect Sizes for Coping
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Effect Sizes for Caregiver Self-efficacy
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Effect Sizes for Physical Functioning
FIGURE 8
FIGURE 8
Effect Sizes for Distress and Anxiety
FIGURE 9
FIGURE 9
Effect Sizes for Depression
FIGURE 10
FIGURE 10
Effect Sizes for Marital-Family Relationships
FIGURE 11
FIGURE 11
Effect Sizes for Social Functioning
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bishop MM, Beaumont JL, Hahn EA, et al. Late effects of cancer and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation on spouses or partners compared with survivors and survivor-matched controls. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1403–1411. - PubMed
    1. Given BA, Given CW, Kozachik S. Family support in advanced cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2001;51:213–231. - PubMed
    1. Arno PS, Levine C, Memmott MM. The economic value of informal caregiving. Health Affairs. 1999;18(2):182–188. - PubMed
    1. Cochrane B, Lewis FM. The partner’s adjustment to breast cancer: A critical analysis of intervention studies. Health Psychol. 2005;24:327–332. - PubMed
    1. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):1–28. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types