Anti-infective external coating of central venous catheters: a randomized, noninferiority trial comparing 5-fluorouracil with chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine in preventing catheter colonization
- PMID: 20711070
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f265ba
Anti-infective external coating of central venous catheters: a randomized, noninferiority trial comparing 5-fluorouracil with chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine in preventing catheter colonization
Abstract
Objective: The antimetabolite drug, 5-fluorouracil, inhibits microbial growth. Coating of central venous catheters with 5-fluorouracil may reduce the risk of catheter infection. Our objective was to compare the safety and efficacy of central venous catheters externally coated with 5-fluorouracil with those coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine.
Design: Prospective, single-blind, randomized, active-controlled, multicentered, noninferiority trial.
Setting: Twenty-five US medical center intensive care units.
Patients: A total of 960 adult patients requiring central venous catheterization for up to 28 days.
Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive a central venous catheter externally coated with either 5-fluorouracil (n = 480) or chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine (n = 480).
Measurements and main results: The primary antimicrobial outcome was a dichotomous measure (<15 colony-forming units or ≥ 15 colony-forming units) for catheter colonization determined by the roll plate method. Secondary antimicrobial outcomes included local site infection and catheter-related bloodstream infection. Central venous catheters coated with 5-fluorouracil were noninferior to chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine coated central venous catheters with respect to the incidence of catheter colonization (2.9% vs. 5.3%, respectively). Local site infection occurred in 1.4% of the 5-fluorouracil group and 0.9% of the chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine group. No episode of catheter-related bloodstream infection occurred in the 5-fluorouracil group, whereas two episodes were noted in the chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine group. Only Gram-positive organisms were cultured from 5-fluorouracil catheters, whereas Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, and Candida were cultured from the chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine central venous catheters. Adverse events were comparable between the two central venous catheter coatings.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that central venous catheters externally coated with 5-fluorouracil are a safe and effective alternative to catheters externally coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine when used in critically ill patients.
Comment in
-
A pioneer approach to preventing central venous catheter infections.Crit Care Med. 2010 Nov;38(11):2255-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f84a13. Crit Care Med. 2010. PMID: 20959753 No abstract available.
-
Coated central venous catheters: mortality, illness severity?Crit Care Med. 2011 Apr;39(4):922-3; author reply 923. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318206b6d9. Crit Care Med. 2011. PMID: 21613862 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources