Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2010 Aug;4(3):220-6.
doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2010.00183.x.

Treatment history in the psychosis prodrome: characteristics of the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study Cohort

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Treatment history in the psychosis prodrome: characteristics of the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study Cohort

Kristin S Cadenhead et al. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Aim: Early identification and better characterization of the prodromal phase of psychotic illness can lead to targeted treatment and, perhaps, prevention of many of the devastating effects of a first psychotic episode. The primary aim of this manuscript is to describe the treatment histories of a large cohort of individuals who entered into one of seven prodromal research programs in a North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study consortium.

Methods: Treatment histories from 372 clinical high-risk subjects are described along with demographic, symptom, diagnostic and functional variables that may have contributed to treatment decisions for this group of individuals.

Results: Of all subjects included, 82.1% had received psychosocial and/or pharmacologic treatment prior to entry. Psychosocial interventions were more common in the attenuated psychotic syndrome prodromal sample, especially those with more negative, disorganized or general symptoms and more impaired functioning. Psychotropic medication had been administered to individuals with a history of Axis I disorders.

Conclusions: Given the many potential clinical presentations, treatments and ethical issues connected with the psychosis-risk syndrome, it is not surprising that clinicians administered a broad range of interventions to study participants prior to their entry into the various research programs. Those individuals with milder and non-specific symptoms were more likely to have received psychosocial treatments, whereas those with more severe symptoms received pharmacologic intervention. Clinical treatment research is needed that addresses the complexities of these psychosis-risk states and helps to specify appropriate treatment at different stages of the psychosis prodrome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Addington J, Cadenhead KS, et al. North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study: A Collaborative Multisite Approach to Prodromal Schizophrenia Research. Schizophr Bull. 2007 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ballon JS, Kaur T, et al. Social functioning in young people at risk for schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2007 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cannon TD, Cadenhead K, et al. Prediction of psychosis in youth at high clinical risk: a multisite longitudinal study in North America. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65(1):28–37. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Corcoran C, Malaspina D, et al. Prodromal interventions for schizophrenia vulnerability: the risks of being "at risk". Schizophr Res. 2005;73(2–3):173–184. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cornblatt BA, Auther AM, et al. Preliminary findings for two new measures of social and role functioning in the prodromal phase of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2007;33(3):688–702. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances