Accountability metrics and paying for performance in education and health care
- PMID: 20712927
- PMCID: PMC2938394
Accountability metrics and paying for performance in education and health care
Abstract
The track record in paying for performance in education is not good; nevertheless, emphasis on accountability and performance has gained momentum in the last 25 years. This emphasis includes systems of merit pay, career ladders, and national board certification. The general failures of these efforts have led some reformers to suggest that teacher pay be directly related to student value-added performance. This suggestion remains controversial but is also the hottest topic in paying for performance in education. Although many similarities exist between education and health care, major differences may make it even harder to install pay-for-performance systems in health than in education. If those systems are to be tried, experiments should begin in a bottom-up fashion at the unit level, rather than being imposed systemwide.
References
-
- A nation at risk. Washington (DC): US Department of Education; 1983.
-
- Protsik J. History of teacher pay and incentive reforms. Presented at the Consortium for Policy Research in Education Conference.Washington, DC. November 2-4, 1994;
-
- Ballou D. Pay for performance in public and private schools. Econ Educ Rev 2001;20(1):51–61.
-
- Ballou D, Podgursky M. Teacher pay and teacher quality. Kalamazoo (MI): W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research; 1997.
-
- Hartley H, Greiner J, Ashford G. Issues and case studies in teacher incentive plans. 2nd edition. Washington (DC): Urban Institute Press; 1994.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
