Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep;7(5):A101.
Epub 2010 Aug 15.

Population health rankings as policy indicators and performance measures

Affiliations

Population health rankings as policy indicators and performance measures

Thomas R Oliver. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

Population health rankings can be used by various actors for different purposes. This article examines those potential uses and concludes that the chief promise of population health rankings lies in 2 areas. The first is to help set agendas - stimulating awareness, motivation, and debate over means to improved health outcomes. The second is to help establish broad responsibility for population health and the need for multisectoral collaboration to improve outcomes. A new performance regime based on rankings will require more research to establish causal pathways and relative determinants of health, as well as stronger evidence about the effects of public and private interventions to guide investment strategies. Finally, leaders who develop and promote population health rankings must further develop the technical community needed to translate the response to the rankings into constructive public debate and policy development.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kindig D, Day P, Fox DM, Gibson M, Knickman J, Lomas J, et al. Health Serv Res. Vol. 38. 6 Pt 2: 2003. pp. 1923–1937.What new knowledge would help policymakers better balance investments for optimal health outcomes? - PMC - PubMed
    1. MacRae DM., Jr . Policy indicators: links between social science and public debate. Chapel Hill (NC): University of North Carolina Press; 1985.
    1. Moynihan DP. The dynamics of performance management: constructing information and reform. Washington (DC): Georgetown University Press; 2008.
    1. Moynihan DP. Through a glass, darkly: understanding the effects of performance regimes. Public Perform Manage Rev 2009;32(4):592–603.
    1. Gormley WT, Jr, Weimer DL. Organizational report cards. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1999.

Publication types