Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep;7(5):A104.
Epub 2010 Aug 15.

Residence in a distressed county in Appalachia as a risk factor for diabetes, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2006-2007

Affiliations

Residence in a distressed county in Appalachia as a risk factor for diabetes, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2006-2007

Lawrence Barker et al. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: We compared the risk of diabetes for residents of Appalachian counties to that of residents of non-Appalachian counties after controlling for selected risk factors in states containing at least 1 Appalachian county.

Methods: We combined Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from 2006 and 2007 and conducted a logistic regression analysis, with self-reported diabetes as the dependent variable. We considered county of residence (5 classifications for Appalachian counties, based on economic development, and 1 for non-Appalachian counties), age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, household income, smoking status, physical activity level, and obesity to be independent variables. The classification "distressed" refers to counties in the worst 10%, compared with the nation as a whole, in terms of 3-year unemployment rate, per capita income, and poverty.

Results: Controlling for covariates, residents in distressed Appalachian counties had 33% higher odds (95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.60) of reporting diabetes than residents of non-Appalachian counties. We found no significant differences between other classifications of Appalachian counties and non-Appalachian counties.

Conclusion: Residents of distressed Appalachian counties are at higher risk of diabetes than are residents of other counties. States with distressed Appalachian counties should implement culturally sensitive programs to prevent diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Map
Figure.
Map of Appalachia showing county development level, 2007. Source: Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC). The ARC uses an index-based county economic classification system to identify and monitor the economic status of Appalachian counties. Data sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics, 2002-2004; US Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Economic Information System, 2003; US Census Bureau, 2000 Census, Summary File 3.

References

    1. The Appalachian region. Appalachian Regional Commission. [Accessed April 9, 2010]. http://www.arc.gov/index.do?nodeId=2 .
    1. Pollard K. A new diversity: race and ethnicity in the Appalachian region. Washington (DC): Population Reference Bureau; 2004.
    1. Birdsall S, Florin J. An outline of American geography. Chapter 7: Appalachia and the Ozarks. US Department of State; 2008. [Accessed April 9, 2010]. http://usa.usembassy.de/etexts/outgeogr/geog07.htm .
    1. Appalachia Leadership Initiative on Cancer. Sowing seeds in the mountains. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute; 1994.
    1. Wewers M, Ahijevych K, Chen M, Dresbach S, Kihm K, Kuun P. Tobacco use characteristics among rural Ohio Appalachians. J Community Health. 2000;25 (5):377–388. - PubMed