Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Sep 27;365(1554):2913-26.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0123.

The roles and values of wild foods in agricultural systems

Affiliations
Review

The roles and values of wild foods in agricultural systems

Zareen Bharucha et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Almost every ecosystem has been amended so that plants and animals can be used as food, fibre, fodder, medicines, traps and weapons. Historically, wild plants and animals were sole dietary components for hunter-gatherer and forager cultures. Today, they remain key to many agricultural communities. The mean use of wild foods by agricultural and forager communities in 22 countries of Asia and Africa (36 studies) is 90-100 species per location. Aggregate country estimates can reach 300-800 species (e.g. India, Ethiopia, Kenya). The mean use of wild species is 120 per community for indigenous communities in both industrialized and developing countries. Many of these wild foods are actively managed, suggesting there is a false dichotomy around ideas of the agricultural and the wild: hunter-gatherers and foragers farm and manage their environments, and cultivators use many wild plants and animals. Yet, provision of and access to these sources of food may be declining as natural habitats come under increasing pressure from development, conservation-exclusions and agricultural expansion. Despite their value, wild foods are excluded from official statistics on economic values of natural resources. It is clear that wild plants and animals continue to form a significant proportion of the global food basket, and while a variety of social and ecological drivers are acting to reduce wild food use, their importance may be set to grow as pressures on agricultural productivity increase.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aberoumand A.2009Nutritional evaluation of edible Portulaca oleracia as plant food. Food Analyt. Meth. 2, 204–207 (doi:10.1007/s12161-008-9049-9) - DOI
    1. Afolayan A. J., Jimoh F. O.2009Nutritional quality of some wild leafy vegetables in South Africa. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 60, 424–431 (doi:10.1080/09637480701777928) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ali-Shtayeh M., et al. 2008Traditional knowledge of wild edible plants used in Palestine (Northern West Bank). J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 4, 13 (doi:10.1186/1746-4269-4-13) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allebone-Webb S. M.2009Evaluating dependence on wildlife products in rural Equatorial Guinea. PhD thesis, London, UK: Imperial College
    1. Anderson D. G.1999Evenki. In Cambridge encyclopedia of hunters and gatherers (eds Lee R. B., Daly R.), pp. 142–146 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

LinkOut - more resources