A multicenter, randomized controlled clinical study on biapenem and imipenem/cilastatin injection in the treatment of respiratory and urinary tract infections
- PMID: 20714145
- DOI: 10.1159/000319952
A multicenter, randomized controlled clinical study on biapenem and imipenem/cilastatin injection in the treatment of respiratory and urinary tract infections
Abstract
Background: Biapenem is an injectable carbapenem antibiotic. A clinical study was designed to evaluate its efficacy and safety in the treatment of respiratory and urinary infections compared to imipenem/cilastatin.
Methods: A total of 216 patients with respiratory or urinary tract infections were enrolled into this multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled clinical study. Each patient was randomly assigned to either the treatment or control group; 106 patients in each group were included in the ITT analyses. The patients were given biapenem 300 mg or imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg/500 mg two or three times daily, i.v. g.t.t. for 7-14 days according to their conditions.
Results: The cure and effective rates were 67.92 and 88.68% in the biapenem group and 76.02 and 93.40% in the imipenem/cilastatin group, the bacterial eradication rates were 93.83 and 98.82%, and the adverse-event rates were 6.54 and 7.41%, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Biapenem is as effective and well-tolerated as imipenem/cilastatin for the treatment of intermediate and severe bacterial infections.
Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Similar articles
-
Intravenous meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of serious bacterial infections in hospitalized patients. Meropenem Serious Infection Study Group.J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 Sep;38(3):523-37. doi: 10.1093/jac/38.3.523. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996. PMID: 8889726 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized, controlled clinical trial on meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin for the treatment of bacterial infections.Chin Med J (Engl). 2002 Dec;115(12):1849-54. Chin Med J (Engl). 2002. PMID: 12622937 Clinical Trial.
-
Biapenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: report from a Swedish Study Group.Scand J Infect Dis. 1996;28(5):507-12. doi: 10.3109/00365549609037949. Scand J Infect Dis. 1996. PMID: 8953683 Clinical Trial.
-
Changing role of carbapenems in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1995;96:17-23. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1995. PMID: 7652498 Review.
-
Imipenem-cilastatin.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1992 Sep;19(3):475-82. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1992. PMID: 1436925 Review.
Cited by
-
Prolonged antibiotics for non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in children and adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 13;2015(8):CD001392. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001392.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26270620 Free PMC article.
-
Carbapenems vs alternative antibiotics for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(2):e18769. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018769. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 31914101 Free PMC article.
-
Biapenem versus meropenem in the treatment of bacterial infections: a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial.Indian J Med Res. 2013 Dec;138(6):995-1002. Indian J Med Res. 2013. PMID: 24521647 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Head-to-head trials of antibiotics for bronchiectasis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 5;9(9):CD012590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012590.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30184243 Free PMC article.
-
Development of novel antibacterial drugs to combat multiple resistant organisms.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Feb;400(2):153-65. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1280-4. Epub 2015 Feb 11. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015. PMID: 25667169 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical