An enhanced recovery programme reduces length of stay after rectal surgery
- PMID: 20714738
- DOI: 10.1007/s00384-010-1032-4
An enhanced recovery programme reduces length of stay after rectal surgery
Abstract
Purpose: Enhanced Recovery Programmes (ERP) result in shorter hospital stay after colonic resection with no increase in complication, mortality or readmission rates. There is little data regarding the use of an ERP after rectal resection. We investigated the effect of introducing laparoscopic surgery and the ERP on outcomes in our unit.
Methods: From February 2007, elective patients undergoing rectal resection (laparoscopic or open) under the care of two colorectal surgeons were placed into the ERP. Length of stay (LOS) was recorded as total LOS, including readmissions. Comparison was made with a cohort of patients from 2004-2005 before the onset of laparoscopic surgery/ERP.
Results: Forty patients in the ERP group were compared with 42 patients from 2004-2005. Morbidity and mortality rates were similar. LOS was shorter in the ERP group cf. the retrospective group (median 7 days vs. 11 days; p=0.002). Median LOS was shorter in both laparoscopic ERP patients (6 days cf. 11 days; p= 0.004) and open ERP patients (7 days cf. 11 days; p=0.014) cf. the retrospective group.
Conclusion: Patients having rectal resections benefit from a multimodal approach to surgery with significant reductions in LOS, but no change in morbidity or mortality.
Similar articles
-
A cohort study of results following elective colonic and rectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme.Colorectal Dis. 2009 May;11(4):366-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01604.x. Epub 2009 Jul 9. Colorectal Dis. 2009. PMID: 18624823 Clinical Trial.
-
Does an enhanced recovery programme add value to laparoscopic colorectal resections?Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Nov;30(11):1473-7. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2320-9. Epub 2015 Jul 19. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015. PMID: 26189027
-
Clinical and Economic Impact of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Open and Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jul;28(7):811-818. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0677. Epub 2018 Feb 16. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018. PMID: 29451415
-
Newly implemented enhanced recovery pathway positively impacts hospital length of stay.Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):4019-28. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4714-8. Epub 2015 Dec 22. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 26694181
-
Factors predicting deviation from an enhanced recovery programme and delayed discharge after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.Colorectal Dis. 2012 Mar;14(3):e103-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02799.x. Colorectal Dis. 2012. PMID: 22094022
Cited by
-
Incomplete reporting of enhanced recovery elements and its impact on achieving quality improvement.Br J Surg. 2015 Dec;102(13):1594-1602. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9918. Epub 2015 Sep 14. Br J Surg. 2015. PMID: 26364714 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Unselected rectal cancer patients undergoing low anterior resection with defunctioning ileostomy can be safely managed within an Enhanced Recovery Programme.Tech Coloproctol. 2013 Feb;17(1):73-8. doi: 10.1007/s10151-012-0886-6. Epub 2012 Aug 31. Tech Coloproctol. 2013. PMID: 22936593
-
Volume-outcome relationship in rectal cancer surgery.Discov Oncol. 2021 Apr 12;12(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s12672-021-00406-9. Discov Oncol. 2021. PMID: 35201453 Free PMC article.
-
Improving postoperative outcome in rectal cancer surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in an era of increasing laparoscopic resection.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Dec;406(8):2769-2779. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02266-x. Epub 2021 Jul 26. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021. PMID: 34312719
-
Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations.World J Surg. 2013 Feb;37(2):285-305. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1787-6. World J Surg. 2013. PMID: 23052796 No abstract available.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources