Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Nov;25(11):1359-62.
doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-1032-4. Epub 2010 Aug 17.

An enhanced recovery programme reduces length of stay after rectal surgery

Affiliations

An enhanced recovery programme reduces length of stay after rectal surgery

Graham Branagan et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: Enhanced Recovery Programmes (ERP) result in shorter hospital stay after colonic resection with no increase in complication, mortality or readmission rates. There is little data regarding the use of an ERP after rectal resection. We investigated the effect of introducing laparoscopic surgery and the ERP on outcomes in our unit.

Methods: From February 2007, elective patients undergoing rectal resection (laparoscopic or open) under the care of two colorectal surgeons were placed into the ERP. Length of stay (LOS) was recorded as total LOS, including readmissions. Comparison was made with a cohort of patients from 2004-2005 before the onset of laparoscopic surgery/ERP.

Results: Forty patients in the ERP group were compared with 42 patients from 2004-2005. Morbidity and mortality rates were similar. LOS was shorter in the ERP group cf. the retrospective group (median 7 days vs. 11 days; p=0.002). Median LOS was shorter in both laparoscopic ERP patients (6 days cf. 11 days; p= 0.004) and open ERP patients (7 days cf. 11 days; p=0.014) cf. the retrospective group.

Conclusion: Patients having rectal resections benefit from a multimodal approach to surgery with significant reductions in LOS, but no change in morbidity or mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lancet Oncol. 2005 Jul;6(7):477-84 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Mar;208(3):383-9 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Mar;13(3):413-24 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 2007 Jul;94(7):890-3 - PubMed
    1. Zentralbl Chir. 2006 Oct;131(5):383-7 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources