Survivorship analysis of the uncemented porous-coated anatomic knee replacement
- PMID: 2071618
Survivorship analysis of the uncemented porous-coated anatomic knee replacement
Erratum in
- J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991 Sep;73(8):1274
Abstract
Ninety-six patients who had a total of 108 replacements with an uncemented porous-coated anatomic knee prosthesis were followed for an average of sixty-four months (range, thirty-nine to ninety-three months). At the time of the most recent follow-up, twenty-one implants (19 per cent) had failed, all due to problems with the tibial component. A patellar component was not used, and no noteworthy patellar problems were encountered after the operation. There were no infections about the prostheses, and no femoral implant was revised. The most common cause of failure was collapse of the anteromedial part of the tibial plateau, which occurred in fourteen knees. The prosthesis loosened without collapse of bone in two knees, and five knees were revised because of gross wear of the polyethylene. When the time of failure was defined as the point at which revision of the prosthesis was recommended, the cumulative rate of survival was 84 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval, +/- 7 per cent) at five years and 77 +/- 10 per cent at six years. When the time of failure was defined as the point at which the knee replacement was actually done, the five-year rate of survival was the same. No significant differences were demonstrated between groups that were stratified by age, sex, weight, or primary diagnosis. We therefore do not recommend the use of an uncemented porous-coated anatomic knee replacement of the design that was evaluated in this study.
Similar articles
-
[Uncemented knee prosthesis. Results apropos of 58 cases with a minimum of 5-year follow-up].Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1995;81(6):505-13. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1995. PMID: 8560021 French.
-
Evaluation of the anatomic patellar prosthesis in uncemented porous-coated total knee arthroplasty: seven-year results.Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1995 May;24(5):412-9. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1995. PMID: 7620863
-
Progressive subluxation and polyethylene wear in total knee replacements with flat articular surfaces.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Feb;(299):60-71. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994. PMID: 8119038
-
Porous-coated anatomic total knee arthroplasty. A prospective analysis comparing cemented and cementless fixation.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Jun;(267):128-36. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991. PMID: 2044263 Review.
-
The stiff total knee replacement: causes, treatment, and prevention.Instr Course Lect. 1997;46:191-5. Instr Course Lect. 1997. PMID: 9143962 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Clinical outcomes and survivorship of cementless triathlon total knee arthroplasties: a systematic review.Arthroplasty. 2022 Jun 3;4(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s42836-022-00124-9. Arthroplasty. 2022. PMID: 35655250 Free PMC article.
-
Cementless knee arthroplasty: a review of recent performance.Bone Jt Open. 2021 Jan 22;2(1):48-57. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.21.BJO-2020-0172.R1. eCollection 2021 Jan. Bone Jt Open. 2021. PMID: 33537676 Free PMC article.
-
Bone ingrowth in well-fixed retrieved porous tantalum implants.J Arthroplasty. 2013 Jun;28(6):922-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.035. Epub 2013 Mar 18. J Arthroplasty. 2013. PMID: 23518432 Free PMC article.
-
Cementless Compared to Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated With More Revisions Within 1 Year of Index Surgery.Arthroplast Today. 2023 May 10;21:101122. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101122. eCollection 2023 Jun. Arthroplast Today. 2023. PMID: 37521088 Free PMC article.
-
Similar survival between uncemented and cemented fixation prostheses in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic comparative analysis using registers.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Dec;22(12):3191-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2806-3. Epub 2013 Dec 14. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014. PMID: 24337525
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources