Effects of a 1.94% sulfonic acid teat dip and a 1% iodophor teat dip on teat canal infections in lactating dairy cows
- PMID: 2071709
- DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78263-5
Effects of a 1.94% sulfonic acid teat dip and a 1% iodophor teat dip on teat canal infections in lactating dairy cows
Abstract
Sixty-three cows were used in a natural exposure trial for 1 yr to determine the effects of a 1.94% linear dodecyl benzene sulfonic acid and a 1% iodophor teat dip on teat canal and intramammary infections. Overall, total teat canal infections increased 28.9% and total intramammary infections increased 30% in quarters dipped with the linear dodecyl benzene sulfonic acid compared with a 14.3% increase in teat canal infections and a 17.4% decrease in intramammary infections for the iodophor group. Higher frequencies were observed for teat canal and intramammary infections caused by Staphylococcus epidermidis in the linear dodecyl benzene sulfonic acid group. Staphylococcus hyicus was the predominant organism isolated from teat canal and intramammary infections in the iodophor group. No difference was observed between the two teat dips in the persistence of Staphylococcus aureus teat canal infections. A greater number of S. hyicus teat canal infections persisted in the iodophor group, whereas teat canal infections produced by S. epidermidis and Staphylococcus xylosus persisted longer in the sulfonic acid group. Results of this study indicated that use of a linear dodecyl benzene sulfonic acid teat dip for 1 yr was not associated with increased S. aureus teat canal infections and intramammary infections. However, linear dodecyl benzene sulfonic acid appeared to affect the distribution of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from teat canal infections and intramammary infections.
Similar articles
-
Effects of teat dipping on intramammary infections by staphylococci other than Staphylococcus aureus.J Dairy Sci. 1987 Apr;70(4):873-9. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80086-3. J Dairy Sci. 1987. PMID: 3584621
-
Effect of postmilking teat antisepsis on teat canal infections in lactating dairy cows.J Dairy Sci. 1990 Feb;73(2):373-80. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78683-3. J Dairy Sci. 1990. PMID: 2184176
-
Field studies on linear dodecyl benzene sulfonic acid teat dip.J Dairy Sci. 1985 Jun;68(6):1523-30. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(85)80992-9. J Dairy Sci. 1985. PMID: 3894446
-
[Microbiological colonisation of bovine teat canal--significance and influencing factors].Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2011 Mar-Apr;124(3-4):114-22. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2011. PMID: 21465768 Review. German.
-
Uptake on postmilking teat antisepsis.J Dairy Sci. 1984 Jun;67(6):1336-53. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81443-5. J Dairy Sci. 1984. PMID: 6378998 Review.
Cited by
-
Identification of veterinary pathogens by use of commercial identification systems and new trends in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of veterinary pathogens.Clin Microbiol Rev. 1994 Jul;7(3):346-56. doi: 10.1128/CMR.7.3.346. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1994. PMID: 7923054 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of pre-milking teat preparation procedures on the microbial count on teats prior to cluster application.Ir Vet J. 2009 Jul 1;62(7):461-7. doi: 10.1186/2046-0481-62-7-461. Ir Vet J. 2009. PMID: 21851738 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical