Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug 19:10:500.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-500.

The opportunities for and obstacles against prevention: the example of Germany in the areas of tobacco and alcohol

Affiliations

The opportunities for and obstacles against prevention: the example of Germany in the areas of tobacco and alcohol

Ulla Walter et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Recent years have seen a growing research and policy interest in prevention in many developed countries. However, the actual efforts and resources devoted to prevention appear to have lagged well behind the lip service paid to the topic.

Discussion: We review the evidence on the considerable existing scope for health gains from prevention as well as for greater prevention policy efforts in Germany. We also discuss the barriers to "more and better" prevention and provide modest suggestions about how some of the obstacles could be overcome.

Summary: In Germany, there are substantial health gains to be reaped from the implementation of evidence-based, cost-effective preventive interventions and policies. Barriers to more prevention include social, historical, political, legal and economic factors. While there is sufficient evidence to scale up prevention efforts in some public health domains in Germany, in general there is a comparative shortage of research on non-clinical preventive interventions. Some of the existing barriers in Germany are at least in principle amenable to change, provided sufficient political will exists. More research on prevention by itself is no panacea, but could help facilitate more policy action. In particular, there is an economic efficiency-based case for public funding and promotion of research on non-clinical preventive interventions, in Germany and beyond, to confront the peculiar challenges that set this research apart from its clinical counterpart.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Tobacco Control Scale.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A brief overview of the German Statutory Health Insurance system.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fries JF, Koop CE, Beadle CE, Cooper PP, England MJ, Greaves RF. et al.Reducing health care costs by reducing the need and demand for medical services. The Health Project Consortium. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:321–325. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199307293290506. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Suhrcke M, Arce R, McKee M, Rocco L. Economic costs of ill health in the European Region. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2008.
    1. Van Baal PH, Polder JJ, de Wit GA, Hoogenveen RT, Feenstra TL, Boshuizen HC. et al.Lifetime medical costs of obesity: prevention no cure for increasing health expenditure. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e29. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050029. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Russell LB. Preventing chronic disease: an important investment, but don't count on cost savings. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:42–45. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.42. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kingdon J. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown & Co; 1995.