Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Nov;19(11):644-54.
doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2010.06.1056. Epub 2010 Aug 16.

Acute myocardial rescue with endogenous endothelial progenitor cell therapy

Affiliations

Acute myocardial rescue with endogenous endothelial progenitor cell therapy

Pavan Atluri et al. Heart Lung Circ. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: Post-myocardial infarction heart failure is a major health concern with limited therapy. Molecular revascularisation utilising granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GMCSF) mediated endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) upregulation and stromal cell derived factor-1α (SDF) mediated myocardial EPC chemokinesis, may prevent myocardial loss and adverse remodelling. Vasculogenesis, viability, and haemodynamic improvements following therapy were investigated.

Procedures: Lewis rats (n=91) underwent LAD ligation and received either intramyocardial SDF and subcutaneous GMCSF or saline injections at the time of infarction. Molecular and haemodynamic assessments were performed at pre-determined time points following ligation.

Findings: SDF/GMCSF therapy upregulated EPC density as shown by flow cytometry (0.12±0.02% vs. 0.06±0.01% circulating lymphocytes, p=0.005), 48hours following infarction. A marked increase in perfusion was evident eight weeks after therapy, utilising confocal angiography (5.02±1.7×10(-2)μm(3)blood/μm(3)myocardial tissue vs. 2.03±0.710(-2)μm(3)blood/μm(3)myocardial tissue, p=0.00004). Planimetric analysis demonstrated preservation of wall thickness (0.98±0.09mm vs. 0.67±0.06mm, p=0.003) and ventricular diameter (7.81±0.99mm vs. 9.41±1.1mm, p=0.03). Improved haemodynamic function was evidenced by echocardiography and PV analysis (ejection fraction: 56.4±18.1% vs. 25.3±15.6%, p=0.001; pre-load adjusted maximal power: 6.6±2.6mW/μl(2) vs. 2.7±1.4mW/μl(2), p=0.01).

Conclusion: Neovasculogenic therapy with GMCSF-mediated EPC upregulation and SDF-mediated EPC chemokinesis maybe an effective therapy for infarct modulation and preservation of myocardial function following acute myocardial infarction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative flow cytometric plots of circulating blood 48 hours following acute LAD ligation. (A + B) Pseudo-color plots delineating the desired viable (7AAD) lymphocyte population selected utilising side and forward scatter. (C + D) Lineage negative, CD45dim lymphocytes. (E) EPC density in a representative saline control animal, as determined by co-labeling for VEGFR2 and cKit (CD45dim). (F) EPC density in a representative SDF/GMCSF control animal, as determined by co-labeling for VEGFR2 and cKit (CD45dim).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Three dimensional microvascular lectin angiogram demonstrating enhanced myocardial perfusion following neovasculogenic therapy. Representative microvascular angiograms from remote, non-ischaemic and peri-infarct borderzone myocardium of saline control and SDF/GMCSF treated groups. (25× magnification)
Figure 3
Figure 3
1) Representative haematoxylin and eosin stained images of myofilament density within the remote (A=Saline Control, B=SDF/GMCSF) and borderzone myocardium (C=Saline Control, D=SDF/GMCSF). 2) Myofilament density within the remote and borderzone myocardium. (40× magnification).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Representative cross-sectional Masson’s Trichrome stained sections of (A) saline control and (B) SDF/GMCSF treated myocardial specimens. Small arrows indicate regions of myocardial peri-infarct borderzone measurements. Large arrows indicate ventricular diameter. Collagen of scar is stained blue and viable myocardium is stained red.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Representative end-diastolic, parasternal, short axis echocardiographic views at the level of the papillary muscle of the left ventricle, 8 weeks following LAD ligation, demonstrating significant dilatation and lateral wall thinning of the control hearts when compared to the SDF/GMCSF group (A= Saline Control, B= SDF/GMCSF). M-mode echocardiographic images delineating left ventricular dilatation and lateral wall thinning (C= Saline Control, D=SDF/GMCSF).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Pressure-volume loops from (A) saline control and (B) SDF/GMCSF treated hearts 8 weeks following LAD ligation. Pressure-volume loops were obtained with an intra-venticular left ventricular pressure-volume catheter during occlusion of the inferior vena cava. Slope of contractility is represented in red.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boodhwani M, Sodha NR, Laham RJ, Sellke FW. The future of therapeutic myocardial angiogenesis. Shock. 2006 Oct;26(4):332–341. - PubMed
    1. Assmus B, Schachinger V, Teupe C, Britten M, Lehmann R, Dobert N, Grunwald F, Aicher A, Urbich C, Martin H, Hoelzer D, Dimmeler S, Zeiher AM. Transplantation of Progenitor Cells and Regeneration Enhancement in Acute Myocardial Infarction (TOPCARE-AMI) Circulation. 2002 Dec 10;106(24):3009–3017. - PubMed
    1. Woo YJ, Grand TJ, Berry MF, Atluri P, Moise MA, Hsu VM, Cohen J, Fisher O, Burdick J, Taylor M, Zentko S, Liao G, Smith M, Kolakowski S, Jayasankar V, Gardner TJ, Sweeney HL. Stromal cell-derived factor and granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor form a combined neovasculogenic therapy for ischemic cardiomyopathy. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2005 Aug;130(2):321–329. - PubMed
    1. Numaguchi Y, Sone T, Okumura K, Ishii M, Morita Y, Kubota R, Yokouchi K, Imai H, Harada M, Osanai H, Kondo T, Murohara T. The impact of the capability of circulating progenitor cell to differentiate on myocardial salvage in patients with primary acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2006 Jul 4;114(1 Suppl):I114–I119. - PubMed
    1. Simons M. Angiogenesis: where do we stand now? Circulation. 2005 Mar 29;111(12):1556–1566. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances