Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Feb;54(1):99-117.
doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0010). Epub 2010 Aug 18.

Psycholinguistic profiling differentiates specific language impairment from typical development and from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Psycholinguistic profiling differentiates specific language impairment from typical development and from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Sean M Redmond et al. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Practitioners must have confidence in the capacity of their language measures to discriminate developmental language disorders from typical development and from other common disorders. In this study, psycholinguistic profiles were collected from 3 groups: children with specific language impairment (SLI), children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and children with typical development (TD). The capacity of different language indices to successfully discriminate SLI cases from TD and ADHD cases was examined through response operating characteristics curves, likelihood ratios, and binary logistic regression.

Method: The Test of Early Grammatical Impairment (Rice & Wexler, 2001a), Dollaghan and Campbell's (1998) nonword repetition task, Redmond's (2005) sentence recall task, and the Test of Narrative Language (Gillam & Pearson, 2004) were administered to 60 children (7-8 years of age).

Results: Diagnostic accuracy was high for all 4 psycholinguistic measures, although modest reductions were observed with the SLI versus ADHD discriminations. Classification accuracy associated with using the Test of Early Grammatical Impairment and the Sentence Recall task was equivalent to using all 4 measures.

Implications: Outcomes confirmed and extended previous investigations, documenting high levels of diagnostic integrity for these particular indices and supporting their incorporation into eligibility decisions, differential diagnosis, and the identification of comorbidity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box plots for Test of Early Grammatical Impairment (TEGI) Screening Test scores, displaying group medians, first and third quartiles, 10th and 90th percentiles, outliers (○), and extreme scores (★). SLI = specific language impairment; ADHD = attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Numbers associated with outlier/extreme scores refer to individual case numbers.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box plots for nonword repetition percent phonemes correct, displaying group medians, first and third quartiles, 10th and 90th percentiles, outliers (○), and extreme scores (★).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Box plots for sentence recall, displaying group medians, first and third quartiles, 10th and 90th percentiles, outliers (○), and extreme scores (★).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Box plots for Test of Narrative Language (TNL) Ability Index, displaying group medians, first and third quartiles, 10th and 90th percentiles, outliers (○), and extreme scores (★).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Response operating characteristics (ROC) curves associated with psycholinguistic discrimination of SLI and typical developing groups (reference line indicates test accuracy at “chance”). Diagonal segments are produced by ties.
Figure 6
Figure 6
ROC curves associated with psycholinguistic discrimination of SLI and ADHD groups (reference line indicates test accuracy at “chance”). Diagonal segments are produced by ties.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA. Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms & Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families; 2001.
    1. Akobeng AK. Understanding diagnostics tests 3: Receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Pediatrica. 2007;96:644–647. - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4. Washington, DC: Author; 1994.
    1. Archibald LMD, Joanisse MF. On the sensitivity and specificity of nonword repetition and sentence recall to language and memory impairments in children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2009;52:899–914. - PubMed
    1. Baker L, Cantwell D. Developmental, social and behavioral characteristics of speech and language disordered children. Child Psychiatry and Human Development. 1982;12:195–206. - PubMed

Publication types