Analysis of published data for top concentration considerations in mammalian cell genotoxicity testing
- PMID: 20720196
- DOI: 10.1093/mutage/geq046
Analysis of published data for top concentration considerations in mammalian cell genotoxicity testing
Abstract
The ability of the in vitro mammalian cell tests currently used to identify genotoxins has been shown to be limited by a high rate of false-positive results, triggering further unnecessary testing in vivo. During an European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods workshop on how to improve the specificity of these assays, testing at high concentrations was identified as one possible source of false positives. Thus far, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development genotoxicity test guidelines have required testing of chemicals using mammalian cells in vitro should be undertaken to concentrations as high as 10 mM (5000 μg/ml). Recently, a draft revision of the International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use genotoxicity test guidelines has recommended that testing concentrations should be reduced to 1 mM (500 μg/ml). To assess the impact that this lowering would have on the outcome of in vitro genotoxicity testing, we established a database of 384 chemicals classified as rodent carcinogens and reported Ames test results and the test concentrations that produced positive results in the mouse lymphoma assay (MLA), in vitro chromosome aberration (CA) assay and in vitro micronucleus test. Genotoxicity testing results were illustrated for 229 and 338 compounds in the MLA and in vitro CA assay, respectively. Of these test compounds, 62.5% produced positive results in the MLA, of which 20.3% required testing between 1 and 10 mM. A total of 58.0% produced positive results in in vitro CA assays, of which 25.0% required testing between 1 and 10 mM. If the testing concentration limit for mammalian cell assays was reduced to 1 mM, 24 (6.25%) potential carcinogens would not be detected in any part of the standard in vitro genotoxicity test battery (Ames test, MLA and in vitro CA assay). Further re-evaluation and/or retest of these compounds by Kirkland and Fowler [Kirkland, D. and Fowler, P. (2010) Further analysis of Ames-negative rodent carcinogens that are only genotoxic in mammalian cells in vitro at concentrations exceeding 1 mM, including retesting of compounds of concern. Mutagenesis 25, 539-553] suggest that the current 10 mM top concentration can be reduced without any loss of sensitivity in detecting rodent carcinogens.
Comment in
-
Further analysis of Ames-negative rodent carcinogens that are only genotoxic in mammalian cells in vitro at concentrations exceeding 1 mM, including retesting of compounds of concern.Mutagenesis. 2010 Nov;25(6):539-53. doi: 10.1093/mutage/geq041. Epub 2010 Aug 18. Mutagenesis. 2010. PMID: 20720197 Review.
Comment on
-
Validation study of the in vitro micronucleus test in a Chinese hamster lung cell line (CHL/IU).Mutagenesis. 1999 Nov;14(6):569-80. doi: 10.1093/mutage/14.6.569. Mutagenesis. 1999. PMID: 10567032
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.Mutat Res. 2006 Sep 19;608(1):29-42. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.04.017. Mutat Res. 2006. PMID: 16769241
-
Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.Mutat Res. 2005 Jul 4;584(1-2):1-256. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.02.004. Mutat Res. 2005. PMID: 15979392
-
Further analysis of Ames-negative rodent carcinogens that are only genotoxic in mammalian cells in vitro at concentrations exceeding 1 mM, including retesting of compounds of concern.Mutagenesis. 2010 Nov;25(6):539-53. doi: 10.1093/mutage/geq041. Epub 2010 Aug 18. Mutagenesis. 2010. PMID: 20720197 Review.
-
Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology: an appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes.Mutat Res. 2005 Dec 30;588(2):88-105. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.09.006. Epub 2005 Dec 2. Mutat Res. 2005. PMID: 16326131 Review.
-
A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins.Mutat Res. 2011 Mar 18;721(1):27-73. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.12.015. Epub 2011 Jan 14. Mutat Res. 2011. PMID: 21238603
Cited by
-
Synergistic cytotoxicity and DNA strand breaks in cells and plasmid DNA exposed to uranyl acetate and ultraviolet radiation.J Appl Toxicol. 2015 Apr;35(4):338-49. doi: 10.1002/jat.3015. Epub 2014 May 15. J Appl Toxicol. 2015. PMID: 24832689 Free PMC article.
-
An Enhanced Metabolization Protocol for In Vitro Genotoxicity Assessment of N-Nitrosamines in Mammalian Cells.Environ Mol Mutagen. 2025 Apr;66(4):210-220. doi: 10.1002/em.70009. Epub 2025 Mar 28. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2025. PMID: 40152425 Free PMC article.
-
A Novel Strategy to Predict Carcinogenicity of Antiparasitics Based on a Combination of DNA Lesions and Bacterial Mutagenicity Tests.Front Public Health. 2017 Nov 9;5:288. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00288. eCollection 2017. Front Public Health. 2017. PMID: 29170735 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Genetic toxicology in silico protocol.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Oct;107:104403. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104403. Epub 2019 Jun 11. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019. PMID: 31195068 Free PMC article.
-
Uranyl acetate induced DNA single strand breaks and AP sites in Chinese hamster ovary cells.Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2018 Jun 15;349:29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2018.04.022. Epub 2018 Apr 24. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2018. PMID: 29698738 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources